General20
Basketball Maven
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,855
- Like
- 12,678
So I always get concerned when I start seeing responses of "he is out of our budget or we can't pay the price " comments because it seemingly turns into some sort of board truth that I would wager is not remotely accurate. On more than a few occasions board insiders have shared Nil is mostly not an issue BUT it's not unlimited either. Choosing not to over pay in the market to me is smart. For example I believe it was validated that we had met Edwards original asking price and then West Virginia came in and offered more is the story. Allot more. Syracuse deciding not to overpay the outlier number doesn't mean they couldn't have, it just means they wanted to spend different.
Great post. The other sport I really like besides college basketball is soccer, and in that sport you have always had to buy your players.
Just like in college, there are a handful of teams that just have way more resources than anybody else and spend without regard.
The rest of the teams are using a budget. Almost without qualifications the ones that struggle are the teams that get desperate and overspend. The teams that have a valuation of every position and every player, and stick to it, tend to be the successful. Long term, making your fifth best player your highest paid player just because you are desperate for a point guard isn't a good idea. There are other fish in the sea, you have to find the right fit at the right price.
We already have, in my opinion at least, two very good players who are perfect fits for what we need. Clearly there is money to spend. Also, clearly, we are not Duke or Kansas that can just write a check for whatever amount is necessary to get the player we want. We have to find the right player, yes, but also at the right price. Let's let the process play out. We are 2 for 2 so far.
