Here's the thing. In the ACC it's not just Cuse getting worse and stinking it up. There are 3 tourney teams, I don't think UNC should even sniff the last 4 in but they have the brand so who knows.I get that NIL is relatively new and people are trying to still figure things out. But at the same time this was year 4 of NIL. There was no excuse for not being more prepared before this season, especially having lost a key player the year before. Which makes me wonder was NIL an issue or was it a smoke screen to cover for Red?
I don't expect SU to be ahead of the curve, but we also shouldn't be well behind. So the question is did the changes we made to NIL catch us up with the 2024 environment? Or will it have us caught up to the 2025 market? If it is the former then we are still behind.
That means there are 15 ACC teams that are not even close to the bubble right now. All of them are behind in NIL, talent and coaching. SMU has a huge nil payroll which got them in the CFP but wasn't enough for the tourney this year either.
Outside of the top 3 the only other teams that had top 25 wins in the ACC were UNC with a 2 point win over UCLA and GT beating Louisville.
It's not just us, we are terrible but everyone else is getting worse in the ACC too.