Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 314569, member: 204"]
This is a very interesting post.
 
The message is that one need not be a lawyer to better understand and address this very legal situation.
 
In other words - and as I say this I have not pretense to being a particularly good lawyer - I'm probably very, very average in that regard - three years of formal legal education, studying for the bar exam and practicing law for nearly twenty-eight years affords no better perspective or no better understanding than what you have regarding the Sandusky situation.
 
I can't agree with that. I'm no genius and I'm not a great lawyer, but gosh I have been doing this kind of stuff for a very long time. It's how I try to make a living.
 
And you can't even afford me or anybody with my general background any level of deference.
 
I guess I should not be surprised. This board is all about a bunch of us who know nothing about football trying to critique the work of guys who have spent their lives playing and coaching the game and who do it on a daily basis for a living.
 
As I promised, I will re-read the entire report - I have read much of it - and will not comment further until I have done so.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?