Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
PSU: About football or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="javadoc, post: 316465, member: 338"] With regard to the question of jurisdiction, we disagree. I wish I had the time to dig a little and discover the "legislative intent" of the Bylaws concerning ethical conduct, because I am curious about when those Bylaws were enacted, and why. It could easily be the case that they were meant to address scenarios like you suggest, e.g. lying to recruits. But, I think that the "broad spectrum" clause actually does pull in more than lying to recruits, and if lying to recruits is verboten, then the actions at PSU are also covered. I take an expansive view of the scope, from a plain reading of the text. So the issue with Pitino and his hanky-panky is in fact covered, I believe. I think the Bylaws establish a very broad scope of jurisdiction for ethical conduct in general, but the NCAA has chosen not to enforce it in most (all?) cases until now. I don't know if anyone at the NCAA thinks of it in these legal-ese terms, but what I see is a power that can be exercised in an awful lot of cases, while precedent has shown that the power will not be exercised unless the offense is grave. So choosing to enforce it here does not imperil the lesser evils, because the NCAA has already shown that they won't pursue those. The NCAA isn't awakening to a new-found power; they are saying, "It's time to dust off that big cannon for this situation." I don't have an off-hand suggestion for a bright line standard about what constitutes "activities affecting the athletics program." The word "affecting" opens up a can of worms, as seen by the history of the Interstate Commerce clause in the US Constitution, though. I think weight should be given to activities at the institutional level, versus activities performed by single actors lower in the hierarchy of authority. But it's a pretty broad brush. At least SCOTUS said, "Substantial effect." The NCAA just says "affecting." However, I don't think we need to worry about finding that bright line. The NCAA has shown that it isn't interested in finagling at the boundary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
PSU: About football or not?
Top
Bottom