SanDiegoCuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,268
- Like
- 13,342
I found my people. Haha.got me
I found my people. Haha.got me
You dumb B... it's not a schooner. It's a sailboat!
I'm just glad multiple people picked up on this reference.Ha-ha-ha! You dumb b******, it’s not a schooner, it’s a sailboat
Why is the sky blue?Nailed it
"Why can't I laugh at harmless jokes" is one that stumped you, apparently.Why is the sky blue?
Why does a bear poo in the woods?
Why does Bnoro always have to be an ahole?
Questions that have stumped mankind for ages.
You're 0-2.Why is the sky blue?
Why does a bear poo in the woods?
Why does Bnoro always have to be an ahole?
Questions that have stumped mankind for ages.
You get your choice of joke. Would you prefer:You're 0-2.
Why is the sky blue?
Rayleigh Scattering
Rayleigh scattering, dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation. The process has been named in honor of Lord Rayleigh, who in 1871 published a paper describing this phenomenon.
Always at someone else's expense."Why can't I laugh at harmless jokes" is one that stumped you, apparently.
I want "You're a dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation"You get your choice of joke. Would you prefer:
You're Rayleigh Scattering
You're Lord Rayleigh
You're a dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation
I don't think you can do wrong here, but totally your call.
I'd go for the wordy convoluted one personally but they're all pretty funny.
That's a good reason!I want "You're a dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation"
It's more mathy, which appeals to me.
So you're saying we all aren't just water?I want "You're a dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation"
It's more mathy, which appeals to me.
I want "You're a dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation"
It's more mathy, which appeals to me.
That reminds me. I asked the question awhile back and some people thought it was funny, but it wasn't intended that way.I get the state of "student" athlete now, but the heck does one intend to get a 4 year degree off that?
The NCAA still has academic progress requirements.That reminds me. I asked the question awhile back and some people thought it was funny, but it wasn't intended that way.
Now that we're paying players, do they have to attend class to remain eligible? Or can a non-attend clause simply be written into their 'contracts'.
Thanks. How does that work for someone who has transferred as many times as Gibson?The NCAA still has academic progress requirements.
Just to clarify, the Gibson thread is for Science and the Collins thread is for History.You're 0-2.
Why is the sky blue?
Rayleigh Scattering
Rayleigh scattering, dispersion of electromagnetic radiation by particles that have a radius less than approximately 1/10 the wavelength of the radiation. The process has been named in honor of Lord Rayleigh, who in 1871 published a paper describing this phenomenon.
Just to clarify, the Gibson thread is for Science and the Collins thread is for History.
So the academic progress is a pretty loose standard from what I understand, and transferring actually can help student-athletes out that aren't performing well academically (sounds like that was Quadir Copeland's story for example). I don't know if failing to meet academic standards would disqualify them from NIL.Thanks. How does that work for someone who has transferred as many times as Gibson?
Plus, is failure to meet those progress requirements mean that athletes who don't meet those standards don't get their NIL $$s?
This is all so new and so seemingly random that I honestly don't know the answers to those questions.
I am hoping Collins is the guy for the next 3 years... but still need competition in that room to keep people working hard. Even without injury.
His field of study is "football", and he is now a student/athlete/employee. I guess just show up for practice...?Thanks. How does that work for someone who has transferred as many times as Gibson?
Plus, is failure to meet those progress requirements mean that athletes who don't meet those standards don't get their NIL $$s?
This is all so new and so seemingly random that I honestly don't know the answers to those questions.
Just because Collins may be an ACC caliber starter, it does not mean that he is pro-caliber.If Collins is THE guy he'll be in the pros before his eligibility is up and Williams has path to start.
If Collins isn't the guy Williams has a path to start.
Either way JW has every chance to start 1 or more seasons at QB for us. Not mad he's not being thrown un the deep end with our schedule this season. To an SEC transfer I'm sure it's not nearly as daunting
Jabari will be very good for us. If he leaves I am intrigued by the Freshmen.Would assume this means Jakahri is staying put for now. Which is great news, IMO.
Because I would rather not invite them in? That's what I am going with.Why is the sky blue?
Why does a bear poo in the woods?
Why does Bnoro always have to be an ahole?
Questions that have stumped mankind for ages.
How do you blame a good soldier for leaving after 4 years and bring third string. Players want to playJust because Collins may be an ACC caliber starter, it does not mean that he is pro-caliber.
Of course I would like Williams to stay, but if a player, particularly a non-starter, sees greener grass elsewhere it is hard to be critical.