rak vs. coleman

[orangefan13]

I love to read the positive stretches its the negative ones against JB I hate.
if we lose a game in march its not because of the zone but because of poor shooting and turnovers, anyone who reads the boxscore can figure that out.

 

[orangefog]

I love to read the positive stretches its the negative ones against JB I hate.
We lose in march not because of the zone but because of poor shooting and turnovers, not because of JB and the zone.

The positive is usually to set it up so that anything short of a national championship is totally JB's fault because we clearly have the best talent in the NCAA.

 

[SWC75]

He determined that Ethan Cole was really good just by watching him run up and down the court.

He determined Craig Forth was 2 and done just from watching practice.

He determined the 2001 Syracuse football team was more talented than Miami...somehow.

He determined that Johnny Flynn was the best guard in the history of ESPN after a few college games.

He determined that RJ Anderson was a 1st round pick level talent.

This is what he does.

Syracuse had "way more talent" than Miami.

 

[Dave85]

rak is the superior measureable athlete; coleman the better bball player. let's hope he's fully healthy. if he is, we're top five because of him.

Rak graduated in 3 years and was a very good student. No BB player has ever done that before at SU. I think that counts for something.

 

[OrangeDW]

Syracuse had "way more talent" than Miami.

Yes, that's right.

I forgot another: He determined we had the horses to win "3 NC's in the next 5 years" if only he was allowed to give Boeheim a man to man clinic and if Boeheim incorporated it.

 

[orangedave]

Just Igor being Igor. Sets unreal expectations so he can blame JB when it doesn't happen.

 

[FrancoPizza]

I love to read the positive stretches its the negative ones against JB I hate.
if we lose a game in march its not because of the zone but because of poor shooting and turnovers, anyone who reads the boxscore can figure that out.

So our losses never have anything to do with only playing 1 defense. Got it.

 

[longislandcuse]

When you make these ridiculous statements every year, do you ever consider the talent that other teams have?

Psshhh, this isn't a football recruiting thread.

 

[orangefan13]

So our losses never have anything to do with only playing 1 defense. Got it.

If you look at our last 10 ncaa tournament losses outside maybe oklahoma, none of them do.
You would have to go back to michigan state 00-01 I think to find one, and our zone was the reason we were up 15 at half.

Every other loss has been poor shooting and turnovers.

 

[senorpalmer]

If you look at our last 10 ncaa tournament losses outside maybe oklahoma, none of them do.
You would have to go back to michigan state 00-01 I think to find one, and our zone was the reason we were up 15 at half.

Every other loss has been poor shooting and turnovers.

Yeah but the zone was responsible for the poor shooting and turnovers...