yeah, Id guess his development was really hurt by that decision and it's probably most of the reason he fell so much in the rankings
Could be. I just quick glanced at the 3 decommits recruiting profiles to see who their lead recruiters were but none listed. If all 3 had the same was thinking could speak to an upcoming coaching vacancy but I always try and connect dots whether or not they exist.
Think hill can be a great 3rd down/change of pace back but not sure he has the build to be a 20+ p/g carry bellcow type... I'm not sure we have one on the roster currently
this is fair, I was just stating he has looked better than expected
Im starting to think he may be our most talented back.
well considering our other backs are injury prone, blind, or even more unproven than Hill I agree with you. I still think Willis can be salvaged, but he needs to get better vision and run behind a better Oline before I fully trust him.
I don't think we have an offense that would be one RB taking almost all of the carries unless he is just that much better than all the other backs. Also he would need to be a RB that is great in pass protection and catching the ball for many plays which i'm unsure of how he is that regard. So often that will be a separate rotational back. But I don't see why Tylik wouldn't have the ability to get 20 carries in a game. He is listed at 5'-9 205 lbs. That is a solid size, especially for a freshman. I mean Lequint was listed at just 6'-0" and 201 lbs his final year as a junior.
he was ranked significantly higher a year ago and has dealt with Injuries and essentially losing his junior season due to being the backup to Mickens.
No insider information but the timing of his announcment with the two WR seems like all three where dropped.
PWO no longer exist as far as I'm aware. 105 player hard cap
Listed as RB but could well be an "athlete" with position TBD. Similar to the Central York kid we took.
"Maybe it'll work this time!"
The failure of the offense to modify its tendencies during the midst of a GROB-level offensive collapse remains mind boggling. I do get that the middle runs have value when the passing game is clicking. We saw that on the one Clemson drive where we gashed them for nearly a whole series. At the very least, running that play set frequently... the D probably has to have 2-3 defenders keeping an eye on that part of the field. With good OTs, then it is a matter of 2 edge guys vs 2 OTs. The 3 WRs and TE are likely keeping 4-6 other defenders occupied somehow. A good blocking back to handle one blitzer. I can see where runs up the middle support the passing game.
He played DB in High School.
I was going by the information posted in here. I do not know for a fact, but it seems likely.
