bnoro
Lurker
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 11,363
- Like
- 33,220
He's not2-4-7 has Starks trending to Louisville after the weekend's visit. Neither site shows him visiting Syracuse this weekend.
He's not2-4-7 has Starks trending to Louisville after the weekend's visit. Neither site shows him visiting Syracuse this weekend.
He's not
He's not
The last few (think we only have room for 2 or 3) spots would go to kids who already visited.Are we hosting anyone this weekend then?
I guess if we're full there's not a real need, it just seems really strange not hosting visitors 2 of the last 3 weekends to host. New world I suppose with Dec signing day.
As the numbers stand right now there is room for three more scholarships. And Linton and Dukes don't seem to know where they want to go yet.The last few (think we only have room for 2 or 3) spots would go to kids who already visited.
i.e. Linton, Dukes, Hewitt, etc.
If you are talking about Starks bnoro already posted that he won't be visiting.He's been to clemson twice, SU once in early December. Good sign if we can get him up here again ... since he didn't pull the trigger following his Clemson visit. Not sure if it's updated, but the numerical sports site doesn't even list SU as a possible destination.
He already took his ov. It would be unusual for him to visit again, especially on his own dime, with signing next week. Visiting Clemson or ECU is easy for him.Dukes
And Dukes just tweeted that he is announcing Saturday.That makes sense. Just thinking it would be nice if he came up again - a good sign. But the travel costs/distance may preclude it.
Too bad. I liked him. I assume this means they feel good about Hewitt?He's not
Might be 3. The count of returning scholarship players still includes Shys' scholarship. Depends what the coaches do in that situation. I still want them to hold it for him.CL, it looks like 3 spots just became 2 with the Munoz commitment.
Might be 3. The count of returning scholarship players still includes Shys' scholarship. Depends what the coaches do in that situation. I still want them to hold it for him.
As i mentioned:
YesYou think Hewitt re-upped and we canceled because we're full now ?
I love this kids game. Someone's going to get a good player.
I agree, I would trade out these two in a heart beat.You think Hewitt re-upped and we canceled because we're full now ?
I love this kids game. Someone's going to get a good player.
Definitely I feel he be the better player cuz he is more versatile with being a rb and safety. "hard hitting safety". He had much more and better offers.Must agree with the both of you (PhatOrange & Rackman). For some reason, I think Starks may end up being the better one. If I had my pick for the last couple of spots, I will take Linton and Starks. Particularly with Hewitt visiting USC this very last weekend before SD on Wednesday. I am sure if they want him they'll throw the kitchen sink at the kid.
Must agree with the both of you (PhatOrange & Rackman). For some reason, I think Starks may end up being the better one. If I had my pick for the last couple of spots, I will take Linton and Starks. Particularly with Hewitt visiting USC this very last weekend before SD on Wednesday. I am sure if they want him they'll throw the kitchen sink at the kid.
We don't have the choice, these guys don't want to come to SU.I would for sure take Starks and Dukes given the choice.