Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OttoMets, post: 1738219, member: 716"] Thanks to Knicks's RSCI link and my penchant for wasting time on a slow Friday in the office, I ran a quick spreadsheet of our cumulative recruiting rankings (like in golf and XC, low score is best; rated each unranked kid as a 150). Shows how misleading that kind of thing can be: by this ranking, our best team was...this year (the only time this century we've had a top-eight with no unranked recruits). The next three best teams were 2014, 2008, and 2007. Our national championship team (with three unranked recruits) was near the bottom of the pack and the 2010 team, which many consider our best, was the second-worst. The worst-ranked bunch of recruits was, of course, was the 2002 team, which I would also rank as our worst on-court team of the century, too. So the rankings aren't all wrong. That collection of guys also explains the coaching/recruiting change that happened right before that season. [/QUOTE]