The worst part about retiring it is that an incoming Athletic Director did it in the middle of his first season. How can he know that much about the school already that he makes THAT decision? That has always bothered me. Just felt like a gimmick to try to sell tickets to a game for a very bad team that year.
Since Konrad graduated...
Dee Brown
Ali Culpepper
James Mungro
Diamond Ferri
Walter Reyes
Damian Rhodes
Curtis Brinkley
all refused to wear #44. The number was collecting dust on a shelf.
I guess that told Gross all he needed to know.
OrangeXtreme said:Since Konrad graduated... Dee Brown Ali Culpepper James Mungro Diamond Ferri Walter Reyes Damian Rhodes Curtis Brinkley all refused to wear #44. The number was collecting dust on a shelf. I guess that told Gross all he needed to know.
I remember the buzz about Reyes was after he'd already been here and performed well. I don't recall ever hearing about the others, to be honest.When were they offered to wear it? As a recruit or after they got here?
I understand all that, but I would imagine that some of them just wanted their own number they'd always worn, and others might not have wanted the pressure that comes with wearing 44.Reyes and Rhodes were both offered the number while in HS. Reyes was also offered the number a second time before his senior year.
The kids that were already on the team could have requested a number change when 44 became available, but nobody did.
So much for it being a "living tribute".
You'd think that all the players would fight over the chance to wear the number. Nobody seems to want it.
OrangeXtreme said:Reyes and Rhodes were both offered the number while in HS. Reyes was also offered the number a second time before his senior year. The kids that were already on the team could have requested a number change when 44 became available, but nobody did. So much for it being a "living tribute". You'd think that all the players would fight over the chance to wear the number. Nobody seems to want it.
I understand all that, but I would imagine that some of them just wanted their own number they'd always worn, and others might not have wanted the pressure that comes with wearing 44.
Since Konrad graduated...
Dee Brown
Ali Culpepper
James Mungro
Diamond Ferri
Walter Reyes
Damian Rhodes
Curtis Brinkley
all refused to wear #44. The number was collecting dust on a shelf.
I guess that told Gross all he needed to know.
Here's the thing with restoring 44:
People who are against it will say, "it's about a legacy, not one kid." And that's true. But this one kid could help change the perception of the program. After all, he said he's going to try to bring other elite players with him wherever he commits. So while 44 is about a legacy, offering it to this kid, even though he is just one kid, could help restore that legacy in the long run because of 1) what the perception of landing such a high profile kid could do for the program and 2) the level of friends he could bring with him will put us back on track toward being a legitimate football program in terms of wins and losses.
That said, even if he commits, and SU does decide to give him 44, obviously we won't hear about 44 being unretired until after he's signed, sealed, and officially 100% Orange on LOI day. You don't want to announce that you've restored the number, since everyone will know it's specifically for him, and then have him flip and go elsewhere. Talk about egg on your face.
OrangePA said:The purpose of maintain the jersey - not to retire it - was to provide a living tribute to Jim Brown. Retiring the jersey violated that tribute. Give the kid the jersey and bring back Syracuse University Football Tradition - The TD Cannon, the Saltine Warrior Fight Song, the reference "Bill Orange" the nickname "Orangemen" and - yes, some of you will get upset - the traditional uniform. Thank you.
I have a feeling Washington probably knows a decent QB or two, especially with all his time playing with the USA National team in the International games every year.Side note: If we land an elite RB, you *have* to think that we're a QB's dream school. We actually have some legit wr talent (i.e. Ish) and we play in a dome, in a southern conference. A good RB, some good wr's, and perfect weather is pretty close to the best combination a QB can ask for - especially when it's attached to a good defense.
Times like this are why we need a frigging OC (who is not terrible)
Here's the thing with restoring 44:
People who are against it will say, "it's about a legacy, not one kid." And that's true. But this one kid could help change the perception of the program. After all, he said he's going to try to bring other elite players with him wherever he commits. So while 44 is about a legacy, offering it to this kid, even though he is just one kid, could help restore that legacy in the long run because of 1) what the perception of landing such a high profile kid could do for the program and 2) the level of friends he could bring with him will put us back on track toward being a legitimate football program in terms of wins and losses.
That said, even if he commits, and SU does decide to give him 44, obviously we won't hear about 44 being unretired until after he's signed, sealed, and officially 100% Orange on LOI day. You don't want to announce that you've restored the number, since everyone will know it's specifically for him, and then have him flip and go elsewhere. Talk about egg on your face.
Reyes and Rhodes were both offered the number while in HS. Reyes was also offered the number a second time before his senior year.
The kids that were already on the team could have requested a number change when 44 became available, but nobody did.
So much for it being a "living tribute".
You'd think that all the players would fight over the chance to wear the number. Nobody seems to want it.
I don't recall either being offered the number during recruiting process
Guys didn't ask??? That's the argument???
How many guys asked and were turned down? Tell us that.
And how the heck would you possibly know who did or didn't ask for the number?
The fact is the fact. There was an affirmative decision made after Brown graduated not to retire the number - to honor Brown.
If the number was kept active to honor Jim Brown, and if players didn't want to wear the number, is that honoring Brown or insulting him?
The number was vacant from 1970-1977. You'd think that a running back like Archie Griffin, Tony Dorsett, Earl Campbell, Billy Sims, etc... would have begged for the chance to honor Brown, Davis, and Little. Guess Not
The number went unused again from 1999-2005 when it was retired.
Do you think SU chose to honor Brown's legacy by telling everyone after 1998 that they couldn't have it?
Did Buzz and Jake make a conscious decision to permanently remove the number from circulation after Konrad left in 1998, or has the "Tradition of 44" simply become meaningless to kids 50 years later?
That's the way I always perceived it. It loses its specialness if you just give it to someone for the sake of having it on the roster. Someone needs to be worthy of wearing it, and I just took it to mean they didn't think anyone was a high profile enough player to offer it. And then some guys who they did think about giving it to, already had their own favorite numbers that they wanted to stick with.Good questions.
The problem is you have no answers.
You don't know the facts.
Sorry, but you don't.
There was a conscious effort not to give the number to players who would not
equal Brown, Davis, Little.
They did not want another Mandel R.
OrangePA said:Good questions. I just don't think you have answers. Sorry, I just don't. There was a conscious effort not to give the number to players who would not equal Brown, Davis, Little. They did not want another Mandel R. Or Rich P. There was no problem with Owens or Konrad or Terry Richardson,
TheCusian said:This post may offer a clue as to why players stopped wanting to wear it. If it's framed as "player x" didn't live up to the number, that's at odds with "honoring Jim Brown". It's not trying to be Jim Brown - it's honoring him. Using it as a measuring stick is a kind of "can't win situation" that many players just don't want.
Nice. Maybe in a couple of weeks once things calm down you could try to score an interview with Rob Konrad - the legend of 44 grows.I've been thinking ever since the Washington Q&A about 44, and decided to write out my thoughts on the matter: http://.com/the-case-to-restore-44/