Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
I know we have talked about this multiple times but having one division and scheduling in pods would make me very happy. Taking the top two teams...fantastic move by the ACC. I'd prefer getting rid of the CCG and go straight to a playoff for the conference winners but big steps like this are a wonderful thing in my opinion.
If Syracuse wins 11 or 12 games, Syracuse will be in the discussions for ACC Champion. If we win less than 10 games, we, like everyone else, does not deserve to be in that discussion.I do not see this as a good thing for Syracuse
So the NCAA would end a rule that was THE cause of conference realignment for 20 years.
After realignment is basically over.
Outstanding!
:bat:
Realignment itself was responsible for:
...
I'm sure I'm missing something.
Funny, but only partially true.
The rule itself is probably only truly responsible for:
Arkansas and South Carolina to the SEC
Miami, VT, and BC to the ACC
Nebraska to the Big Ten.
TV was responsible for:
PSU to the Big Ten
FSU to the ACC
Big East football forming
Big 8/SWC merger
Colorado and Utah to the Pac-12
Texas A&M and Mizzou to the SEC
Pitt and SU to the ACC
Maryland and Rutgers to the Big Ten
Realignment itself was responsible for:
Louisville, Cincy, and USF to the Big East
WVU and TCU to the Big 12
Louisville to the ACC
I'm sure I'm missing something.
Cheers,
Neil
Well, I was certainly working in a bit of hyperbole. But, generally speaking many of the moves you attribute to TV went down the way they did because of the 12-team NCAA rule and the necessity of needing a magic 12 to make a conference championship game happen (which just so happens to bring in large TV dollars). Certainly the Big 8/SWC merger. And Nebraska to the B1G, which exacerbated the instability in the Big XII, which led to the Pac-12 scooping up Colorado on the way to 12, etc.
I mean without that stupid, arbitrary rule the SEC may have never added Arkansas, hell maybe the ACC stops at Miami, and things end up playing out a lot differently over the last decade-plus.
- 85 teams moving to the AAC (to backfill TCU, SU, Pitt, WVU and Louisville departures)
- the end of WAC football
AAC was BCS this past year.I was trying to limit it to BCS conferences.
Cheers,
Neil
I didn't read it that they wanted to have 1 division , only that they wanted to have their 2 highest rated teams compete for the championship.Now we get involved with strength of schedule.
That was the speculation here when several different scheduling options were shown which were based on 3 fixed annual matchups for each school coupled with 2 sets of 5 alternating opponents. Such a scheduling scheme would ensure that all ACC schools would visit the Dome at least once every four years. Most here were I favor of such a scheme.Maybe it's just my wishful thinking then because I was thinking this was just step one to a one division thing.