Rickie Collins | Page 6 | Syracusefan.com

Rickie Collins

We aren't going to have Kyle McCord back there and we struggled at times to run the ball when the opponent knew full well we were throwing the ball.

We will have an unproven QB, no LQA who had turned in to a solid all around RB, and turnover on the line which already struggled to open holes. This year against a middling SOS can't be compared to next year under the afore mentioned circumstances. The boys will be swimming in the deep end real quick, Fran better have them ready to swim.
 
I see this 2025 team as young but getting better each week especially if the OL and DL remain healthy.

Win wise who knows but if they stay healthy the second half of the season we will see the team heading into 26 as being one very very good football team that no team is going to want to play.
 
I see this 2025 team as young but getting better each week especially if the OL and DL remain healthy.

Win wise who knows but if they stay healthy the second half of the season we will see the team heading into 26 as being one very very good football team that no team is going to want to play.
Hopefully. Staying healthy played bigger/faster elite teams is more difficult than playing lesser opponents. Especially, when we have younger and smaller players (due to age) that have not experienced the grind of a season. But if we get overwhelmed by that schedule... could be a very big step back to 3-4 wins. If so, harder to keep a team together through another offseason. Given our conference schedule, it is a bad season to be playing Tennessee or Notre Dame, much less both.
 
The OL (and DL) lines will be noticeably approved. A RB can be secured through the portal. Good players at all positions are salivating to play here. Let's not clutch our pearls just yet.
 
Just to say it although I believe most here understand it; scheduling isn't done the year before the season being scheduled. We don't get to choose what games are home and away in conference (and that usually includes the ND element, where they push for home and neutral site games if possible). This schedule was 95% baked before HCFB was hired and this past season's success, or even the makeup of the team itself could not have been projected at that time, especially in light of the rapid change brought about with NIL and transfer rules. If all had "gone to plan" when this schedule was crafted, we'd be in what, year 9 with the same HC and SHOULD have been a well established program. '22 and '23 we were a bowl team (with a new positive outlook in '22 because we had TD and Shrader fighting it out). Nobody saw what was to come with our roster and on-field challenges.
 
The OL (and DL) lines will be noticeably approved. A RB can be secured through the portal. Good players at all positions are salivating to play here. Let's not clutch our pearls just yet.
I think we’re pretty set at RB. I don’t expect Fran to add anyone there.
 
Last year we were loaded with an easy schedule and fought tooth and nail for 9 regular season wins. My eyes are pretty clear at what we lost and haven’t replaced with potentially 3-4 top 10 teams on the schedule. Let’s be a little realistic.
Did you pay any attention to College Football this year?
That argument died after week 4.
 
Hopefully. Staying healthy played bigger/faster elite teams is more difficult than playing lesser opponents. Especially, when we have younger and smaller players (due to age) that have not experienced the grind of a season. But if we get overwhelmed by that schedule... could be a very big step back to 3-4 wins. If so, harder to keep a team together through another offseason. Given our conference schedule, it is a bad season to be playing Tennessee or Notre Dame, much less both.

I agree it's a rough schedule, no doubt, but you have to have a little faith in the coaching staff as well to get these guys ready to play each week.
 
First, I have to say that after 50 years of being an SU football fan, I still know diddly-squat about the technical aspects of the game. I read all of your analyses to learn about it and it makes me smarter until I forget what I’ve learned.

However, the thing that Fran has that we’ve lacked at times is a culture that inspires players to be the best version of themselves. He’s competed at a high level and clearly connects with the players to teach them how to compete successfully. He’s bringing in players that match his DART philosophy and expects to compete and win. I’m ok with that.

We’ve struggled for many years to be competitive with our peers, say nothing about how we’ve fared against really good teams. Fran is successfully recruiting more talented players to Syracuse than most of our recent coaches. I'm really happy about that, too.

I’m glad for a QB competition as our need to score points won’t be diminished next season, but am really hoping our defense gives the offense more opportunities than our competition. We had a lot of winning plays this season, but most were on offense. We need a tad more DART on defense. That’s MY technical analysis…
 
I agree it's a rough schedule, no doubt, but you have to have a little faith in the coaching staff as well to get these guys ready to play each week.
It really looks like a very rough schedule...now. I highly doubt it will become moderately easy but in reality there is no way to predict how tough or easy it will become.
Especially now that rosters and coaching staffs flip like never seen before.
1 game at a time.
+keep producing that "bulletin board" material.

I know Im an idiot for saying bulletin board stuff is real...lol.

My bad Smilin bob...I responded to your post but it wasnt really directed at/ to you. Keep Smilin!
 
The OL (and DL) lines will be noticeably approved. A RB can be secured through the portal. Good players at all positions are salivating to play here. Let's not clutch our pearls just yet.
Ya think? already? My feeling is some good players are... after talking with HCFB. Without that initial introduction, Im not sure there are any players that are even good or above good having us in mind at all. Good players that have a relationship with someone on our team are aware of us...but salivating?
Not yet.
I had a thought a while ago that given the relationship McCord and Ewers had...Ewers would consider us...lol. We may have been on the list but 6th $out of 6 teams.

* I agree with the OL/DL.
& I doubt we pick up a RB that would appear as a lock #1. I would be ecstatic with a big RB pickup. Im thinking itd be similar to QB situation. A quality pickup to improve competition. Given we have experienced Nixon that showed flashes, Willis with very positive potential, was it James the fresh. with speed? returner ☆edit☆ yes. plus in HS he was an RB/WR similar production in both. &Hart + whatever i am forgetting. Enough i believe to give us production and potential stud.
I have no idea but maybe James could be utilized more like an Erv Phillips. Making room for an add.

Let me tell ya...Im just very happy to be even thinking about SU football in mid January!
 
Last edited:
I’m skeptical. Spoke to an LSU fan about him and they weren’t impressed. Throwing motion is a problem.

He does seem to "wind up" his throws a bit.
Proper form is to basically throw from the ear with your elbow up.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
171,590
Messages
4,966,926
Members
6,021
Latest member
OldeOstrom

Online statistics

Members online
35
Guests online
4,789
Total visitors
4,824


...
Top Bottom