MadNY3
All American
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,115
- Like
- 13,763
I’m wincing.
I’m wincing.
I think part of the point is that the Mona Lisa isn’t the jersey, it’s the game. I don’t know the stats off hand, but assuming it was a masterpiece of a performance, then the jersey is the equivalent of the smock da Vinci wore when he painted it.You’re missing the point, anything is worth whatever someone is willing to pay.Of course we would all want a painting that valuable for monetary reasons, but a Syracuse jersey hanging on the wall would look better to some than a painting.
Into the sauce again? Good lord
You’re missing the point, anything is worth whatever someone is willing to pay.Of course we would all want a painting that valuable for monetary reasons, but a Syracuse jersey hanging on the wall would look better to some than a painting.
Thanks for clearing it all upThe Mona Lisa was a terrible example to make your point, in part because you note things are worth what people will pay for it and then picked something which will never, ever be sold. Plus we have some reason to think it has an high intrinsic value - people typically do something around that painting for political stunts like the protesters who threw pumpkin soup on it last year. They don’t pick some random painting at a museum in Missouri.
The contemporary art market would have better made your point, since art that millionaires buy constantly goes through busts in value - and some dealers have admitted the entire market is basically legalized fraud.
But if the sports memorabilia market is analogous to the contemporary art market, that would back up the idea it’s the latest in the line of tulip manias and the current valuations aren’t sustainable. If you wanted to avoid drawing that conclusion, using the Mona Lisa made sense - as it will never be sold and so we have no idea what its future value is…but it doesn’t actually make any sense under scrutiny.
Into the sauce again? Good lord
Thanks for clearing it all up
Is he still swimming back to shore?Rob is a money guy. Apparently he thinks they need to get their financial management together. It would be nice if he could give advice to them and not attack publicly.
Rob volunteer to give oversight instead of this.
Rob is a money guy. Apparently he thinks they need to get their financial management together. It would be nice if he could give advice to them and not attack publicly.
Rob volunteer to give oversight instead of this.
I don't think his ego and desperation to stay relevant will let him see that. Another benefit to paying the players directly is Rob will have one less reason to run his mouth... well maybe.Probably because he’s spewing inaccuracies
Some of us have had personal meetings with Mark Hayes the man in charge of Orange United.
He is very forthcoming with information. Like anything, I’m sure there is a lot more to this story.
At what point does Rob realize he is hurting the cause far more than he is helping? Is he aware that people who were born in the 90s or later are hardly even aware that he even played for Syracuse? Let alone wore the 44????
Time for the university, in my humble opinion, to completely distance themselves from this man
Into the sauce again? Good lord
It is ironic, isn't it?Dude gets mad about being blocked when he blocks anyone who slightly disagrees with anything he says. He’s got issues
Rob is a money guy. Apparently he thinks they need to get their financial management together. It would be nice if he could give advice to them and not attack publicly.
Rob volunteer to give oversight instead of this.
Commitments are already flipping!!!!
Winfred Walton was?The last person I think of who wore 44 is Konrad. I have no lasting memories of him wearing that number. He was a good player, but I don’t remember him at all for wearing the number 44.
Maybe Rob should do his due diligence and look into the resumes and backgrounds of Orange United’s Board. Quite simply a mix of some of the leading minds nationally with local leaders including two former Orange athletes. The group is under the SANIL umbrella. Google that organization, Rob.
My guess is, like always, Rob had an angle that benefited him that he wanted them to participate in. When they said no, he made it about them not being qualified.Maybe Rob should do his due diligence and look into the resumes and backgrounds of Orange United’s Board. Quite simply a mix of some of the leading minds nationally with local leaders including two former Orange athletes. The group is under the SANIL umbrella. Google that organization, Rob.
BTW, SANIL hosts the NIL Summit that our very own Enrique Cruz was privileged to attend last year.
I have had extensive dealings with Mark Hayes, the General Manager of Orange United as we look to build synergies and finalize a partnership between his group and Fine Mess NIL/SyraCRUZ Tailgate. Mark is a Syracuse native and was previously Vice President with the Syracuse Crunch. They have certainly had some growing pains, but have proven to be a first class organization and have been extremely successful in a short period of time reaching all of their internal fundraising goals.
Yeah. I cringed enough to unfollow Rob.I’m wincing.
No, I am not missing the point. Your analogy was off the mark.You’re missing the point, anything is worth whatever someone is willing to pay.Of course we would all want a painting that valuable for monetary reasons, but a Syracuse jersey hanging on the wall would look better to some than a painting.
I think he definitely needs help but part of this from what I’ve been able to glean is that he legitimately thinks 44 was in part retired because of his contribution. Seriously.He has no interest. He wants to be the story.
Maybe we should keep #44 retired. Look what it's doing to him.