Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="reedny, post: 2255647, member: 1423"]
The NCAA has an obligation to enforce rules consistently. Unfortunately, when the UNC investigation broke and Emmert issued his famous "wheelhouse" quote, it appeared that consistency was out the window and UNC was going to be given a free pass. More recently, the COI has has taken a much harder line -- a U-turn from Emmert's circular reasoning. This is good news, and is (depending on the ultimate penalty) a pleasant departure from an era of arbitrary and capricious decisions that has made the COI infamous. If SU players receiving footnote help were kept eligible through excessive academic assistance, then a school giving away whole courses should be held to the same standard ... and penalized on the scale of its violations. Unlike SU's (isolated incidents), UNC's excessive assistance was dispensed on a systemic scale, for 18 years. However, I haven't heard of any allegations going back as far as 25 years (to the season you mentioned).
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?