Rutgers up on #1 Purdue late in 1st half at home | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

Rutgers up on #1 Purdue late in 1st half at home

Pandemonium at Piscataway. Great ending. I'm so jealous!!!
 
Pitt could be the worse team that Colgate loses to so far this year.
Joking? Not sure.
 
690West said:
There is no upset that will surprise me this year. I bet there isn’t a team in the nation with less than 5 losses headed to the tourney. Craziness
Expand...

I'll take your bet, even if there is plenty of craziness.

I like one of the P12 teams having 4 losses or less - that conference is weak and Arizona and UCLA appear to be quite good.

Also Duke has a good chance in the ACC.
 
NineOneSeven said:
WIDE OPEN YEAR BABY JUST GOT TO GET INTO THE TOURNEY THEN WHO KNOWS
Expand...

Possibly. People have been saying its wide open for a while and yet the title game ends up being #1 pretty much year after year recently.

In the last 6 years the final has been:
- 9 #1 seeds
- 1 #2 seed
- 2 #3 seeds

I doubt there has been a period in the history of the NCAA tournament that has had so many #1 seeds in the finals. (75% over 6 years, with not one 4 seed or below)

Probably the most wide open period was 2010-2014, when Butler made the finals twice, Kentucky made it as an 8 seed, and that school that we should not speak somehow won it all twice.
 
jncuse said:
Possibly. People have been saying its wide open for a while (since say 2015) and yet the title game ends up being #1 seeds much more often than not.

In the last 6 years the final has been:
- 9 #1 seeds
- 1 #2 seed
- 2 #3 seeds

I doubt there has been a period in the history of the tournament that has had so many #1 seeds in the finals. (75% over 6 years, with not one 4 seed or below)

Probably the most wide open period was 2010-2014, when Butler made the finals twice, Kentucky made it as an 8 seed, and that school that we should not speak somehow won it all twice.
Expand...
NO WIDE OPEN JUST GET IN BABAYYYY
 
jncuse said:
This Pitt-Colgate is a bit of a conundrum in terms of who to cheer for resume wise.

It's good for Colgate to keep winning.

At the same time we play Pitt twice, and we play the teams that will also play Pitt. So all our wins will go down a small tad if they lose which hurts our NET. So its good for the ACC that Pitt wins these type of games and don't suck more than completely suck level.

So it's a bit of a tie. In the end it comes down to its Pitt. Go Colgate.
Expand...
Just need Colgate to win at least one of the next three to negate Pitt, then roll through the conference like last year (BU and Navy will be tough).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

GoSU96
    • Like
Great start benchmarks
Replies
11
Views
930
FrancoPizza
FrancoPizza
swish7
    • Like
Remaining schedule as of 10.06
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
upperdeck
U
SWC75
    • Love
    • Like
My 2025 SU Basketball Preview - the Schedule: November
Replies
1
Views
519
Bball44
B
U
Almost half time
Replies
1
Views
413
FRANKIEFAN
FRANKIEFAN
U
Say this was week 1 of the coaches poll
Replies
0
Views
281
upperdeck
U

Forum statistics

Threads
170,153
Messages
4,873,900
Members
5,989
Latest member
OttosShoes

Share this page

Online statistics

Members online
43
Guests online
1,346
Total visitors
1,389
Totals may include hidden visitors.


...
Top Bottom