Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OttoinGrotto, post: 3874658, member: 297"] I think the basic logic is that you're already at the top, so you don't want to get better (there's nowhere upward left to go), you want continuity and to defend your spot. An in-house hire might be evaluated as introducing less risk to being dethroned than a new external hire and whatever vulnerability they might present. I just think that's a really risky way to go. And, acknowledging... reality is we're not on the same standing as Duke and UNC. So for us it would be even riskier. [/QUOTE]