Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5012539, member: 1969"] Since the tweeter introduced "insanity" into the equation. I think its insane for the tweeter to make observations based on a few OOC games, rather than the 150+ games these conferences played OOC. The SEC won 36% of its Q1 OOC games. ACC won 28%. SEC won 44% of its Q1+Q2 OOC games. ACC won 40% SEC won 85% of its Q3 games. ACC won 76% SEC scheduled 42% of its games against Q1+Q2. The ACC 31%. (The big 12 28%) They deserve credit for not "gaming" things like others. I don't know if the gap should be as large as it is in terms of seeds of us vs SEC. But the SEC certainly deserves more seeds if we are going to fully look at OOC play. [/QUOTE]