Full_Rebar
All American
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,073
- Like
- 4,213
for the NCAA meet. Just need them in orange next year...if Nike can find the time to get that color
Ok, I give up... Can you point out which one is from SU?
So it's not the one behind the Michigan girl wearing the orange uniform with the Nike swoosh? She's barely visible but I would've guessed her before I guessed the right one.#550 on the right. Blue uniform with the 44 axes logo.
So it's not the one behind the Michigan girl wearing the orange uniform with the Nike swoosh? She's barely visible but I would've guessed her before I guessed the right one.
So the bottom pic is the men's uniform? That looks way better than the women's.That's Virginia. Oregon's women had a different design on Saturday. SU men wore same uniforms they have had all year
So the bottom pic is the men's uniform? That looks way better than the women's.
I'm not a fan myself. Unless people are told, I don't think they even realize it's a 44, and the history of 44 is pretty specific to the football team. I prefer the block 'S'. Having said all that, put a fair amount of orange on the uniform and they can use whatever logo they want.Yes and I agree. I just thought it was interesting to see the alternate logo used. Makes me wonder if Nike/SU has plans to feature it more. I have a feeling that items featuring that logo have sold a lot more than any of the other new football merchandise.
I really like the 44 axes logo, and if it was on a white singlet with orange shorts I think it would look pretty sharp.
Yes and I agree. I just thought it was interesting to see the alternate logo used. Makes me wonder if Nike/SU has plans to feature it more. I have a feeling that items featuring that logo have sold a lot more than any of the other new football merchandise.
I really like the 44 axes logo, and if it was on a white singlet with orange shorts I think it would look pretty sharp.
Because when Nike pitched the idea of one unified brand, they were full of crap and yet we bought it hook, line, and sinker. Nothing they've changed has improved our "brand".
Before Battle Ax
Wasn't the whole point of the block S to create one consistent image to identify the SU brand? Why deviate from that?
I do have a problem using it as the sole way to identify SU athletes. Wasn't the whole point of the block S to create one consistent image to identify the SU brand? Why deviate from that?
Being military...the logo SU wore doesn't bother me. It is branding and unique. As long as Ft Drum is cool with it...I'm cool with it.
I wonder how common block S's are in college sports with so many Xxxxxx States around. I walked into the gym once wearing an all orange shirt with a big blue block 'S' on the front and someone asked if I went to NC State. I know I live in the south, but there was no way my shirt looked anything like NC State red. Maybe they were color blind.Maybe the fact that Mich St and Stanford are also using a block S hasn't helped the SU brand? I don't know, but I can see your point about not making it a full-time logo. I also think that when it comes to brand and marketing that SU is completely clueless, so it's no surprise that they would switch things up trying to find a fit.
I just thought it was cool that the x-c kids got something new and trendy to wear as well. There is also a bit of strategy by wearing an alternate or unique uniform in that sport as part of the strategy is knowing where your top competitors are, and if they don't recognize the uniforms you, then it's an advantage.
I wonder how common block S's are in college sports with so many Xxxxxx States around. I walked into the gym once wearing an all orange shirt with a big blue block 'S' on the front and someone asked if I went to NC State. I know I live in the south, but there was no way my shirt looked anything like NC State red. Maybe they were color blind.
Yeah. I liked the interlocking SU logo. I'm sure if we stuck with that, it could've been modernized. I like 'Cuse as an a secondary logo. It seems to have become that anyway.Very common and that's why using it as the SU brand was a curious decision (like NY's College Team). It's leaps and bounds away from that awful SJ logo, but I think more people would see SU or 'Cuse as the defining brand.
Really the 44 should probably be exclusive to football too. It only became significant because of football. There's a minor connection in basketball with Coleman and Wallace both wearing it, but I think that's coincidence more than anything.I like trying to work 44 into some logos, but the military logo should be exclusive to football. Doesn't make much sense with other sports.
A good logo would be one with a big S, but has subtle 44s hidden in it somehow. The block S has grown on me and seems very traditional, but that's also its biggest negative because so many school use almost the same exact S.