CardiacCuse
All American
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2018
- Messages
- 4,129
- Like
- 7,973
at the end of the day, there arent really many "stars" out there to grab...and they will be hard to get anyway with a bunch of suitors...So this is what I’ve been grappling back and forth with. Say you dump a huge chunk of your NIL into Hines and Wilkens or the $$ level equivalent and then go in on Tobiason. Then you fill in with as many bargains as possible. Is that exciting us because we don’t trust this staff or is it truly exciting the donors more than more of a complete team with the need to coach them up but with likely more options both now and next year?
My concern is the splash excites us but also comes at the cost of a higher likelihood of failing with reduced depth or injury crushing everything… not all that unlike Donnie did even if most of the issue was Red..
I see both points of view and I go back and forth on this. I think it’s us as true fanatics more than how we think the donors see it but that’s a guess. I think a foundation that wins and is tourney bound with more big fish in year two is a better look.. but who knows
so on one hand, its hard to criticize any of the pickups or targets...you kinda have to go with what you can
its not like you can go to the portal store and request the specific players you want and its signed and sealed
players have to agree etc
otoh, i think theres a ton of "under the radar" talent...and thats where its at ...finding those underanked gems
this is where scouting and having an eye for talent is indispensibly important
also, going for european bigs can be a way to really max out on bang for the buck imo
Last edited: