Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
What was harsh? The guy gave a fair and objective assessment of dions play to this point.That guy is pretty harsh with his criticism.
I saw he's had an awful shooting stretch. He's been above 40% one time in a game (41%) since 11/11. 37% from 3 though.
I don't find much of his criticism "fair" at all. He picks a flaw, meditates on it to its limit and exacerbates any effect it has. There is a difference between giving an assessment, and phrasing it with belittling extremes.What was harsh? The guy gave a fair and objective assessment of dions play to this point.
I don't find much of his criticism "fair" at all. He picks a flaw, meditates on it to its limit and exacerbates any effect it has. There is a difference between giving an assessment, and phrasing it with belittling extremes.
Have you not watched him play? That's what dion does, it's an apt description.Agreed "Barreling towards the rim" is not an objective criticism.
He described dions game well, just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not fair. I didn't find it belittling as he points out there is promise in dions future if he can refine parts of his game.I don't find much of his criticism "fair" at all. He picks a flaw, meditates on it to its limit and exacerbates any effect it has. There is a difference between giving an assessment, and phrasing it with belittling extremes.
Waiters already has volume scorer written all over him only a month into his NBA career. But it should be interesting to see how the Cavs’ eventual roster shaping affects Waiters’ shot selection. Though he and point guard Kyrie Irving essentially have carte blanche to hoist up shots, Waiters’ optimal NBA utility will require that he rein in his bulk shooting attempts and tone down his driving game to the point where he can actually convert some of the looks he’s creating. Waiters has some nice ball skills (including a decent off-hand) and can use the pick-and-roll to launch toward the rim by either splitting defenders or wheeling around them.
That said, once Waiters creates a sliver of space, he hurls himself toward the basket without regard for help defense or the potential for the slightest creativity. His basketball world is composed of binaries and straight lines, and that kind of stripped-down court view often does him more harm than good. If Waiters starts to identify the context of the game more clearly (a big if, given that we’ve long waited for so many players to come to a similar realization), his field-goal percentage will jump. If not, he may prove to be equal parts help and imposition to Cleveland’s offense.
I finished that article wondering why any NBA team was giving any minutes to them under any circumstances.I don't find much of his criticism "fair" at all. He picks a flaw, meditates on it to its limit and exacerbates any effect it has. There is a difference between giving an assessment, and phrasing it with belittling extremes.
Just because you say its fair doesnt make it fair. That 2nd paragraph is riddled with hyperbole, I dont like it because I dont find it fair.He described dions game well, just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not fair.
Because Dion is performing far better than they did?I remember a lot of people taking offense to a lot of the heat Jonny Flynn and Donte Greene were getting in the NBA...
Have you not watched him play? That's what dion does, it's an apt description.