dollarbill44
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 9,223
- Like
- 16,346
I think maybe you just told a few people.Even though I would never tell anyone, I had us at 1-2.
I think maybe you just told a few people.Even though I would never tell anyone, I had us at 1-2.
Maybe I'm misremembering but thought the new OC was supposed to take the clock management away from Dino.Voice of Doom: "Last year we pulled out the Liberty game by 3 points. Then we lost the next three games by the same margin. A big factor: decision-making in the final minutes, like failing to run the clock at 2:53 with the 3-point lead."
Notre Dame is very bad this year. This is the year we have to beat Notre Dame. Also NC State is not as good as its rank indicates. Toss up game against FSU. We are underdog against Clemson, Pitt and Wake.That's where I am also.
Clemson, NC State, FSU, Pitt, Wake and Notre Dame are six very challenging games, but none are overwhelmingly tough.
Going 3-3 in those six and winning the rest would make for an excellent year.
I just read that Shrader and other members of the team were sick this past week. That has probably been mentioned on another thread or three.Regardless of the circumstances, at teh beginning of the year I always publicly aver we're playing for a National Championship (not including GRob's tenure). This team is 3x better than I thought we'd be. Louisville's stolen our lunch money for years. Purdue had at least two NFL players on the team. UConn was a gimme. Even though I would never tell anyone, I had us at 1-2. We slipped with Purdue because Garrett (by his own admission) had been having issues during the week and Tucker is still in Rhino mode. The offense is geared to Tucker hitting the line on first down and getting 4 yards. That's do-able with Elmore in front of him. Now they have to rework the offense to get him into space. Anae's a freaking genius. He'll find a way without Shrader losing his efficiency again. I would not be surprised if the play used to spring Gadsden is not used a bunch more. Only this time they'll add another crosser and open the flat.
We're playing for a championship.
I really enjoyed reading this, solid analysis. You know your football.On the positive side: 1) we're 3-0 with victories over two quality programs (and UConn); 2) the team has "bought in" and plays with a lot of heart; 3) we have the best coaching staff we've had in years; and 4) we have better talent at the skill positions than we've had since at least 2018 - including a mobile QB, excellent ST's, an all American RB, a huge OL, and a ranked defense with a surprising DL and pro potential at the second and third levels.
Realistically, however, assuming our DL continues to develop and we clean up our TE coverage, the offense is what is holding us back. Here's why: 1) at WR we are struggling to get separation against press coverage and we don't have a big TE to catch in traffic or a vertical threat to back off the safeties; 2) because of #1, our QB is forced to throw (mostly) 5-15 yard passes, through tight windows to smaller players, and expose his body on runs and scrambles; and 3) because of these passing challenges, the OL faces heavy boxes that make it difficult to open running lanes. These problems are pretty much the inverse of the strengths that Purdue used against us. THeir vertical threat (Jones) forced our secondary to back off (zone in the first half, some press in the second) while their pinpoint QB gashed us underneath with a big TE (Durham). 400+ yards is a lesson we don't want to repeat. Great to see us overcome this adversity and still win the game.
Against UVA, we might not see a vertical threat like Jones. But they have a very good QB and a big WR (K. Thompson). I hope our D has some answers for them. On offense, I expect GS to be healthier, less hurried and more accurate than he was against Purdue. This week the staff will be coaching up our WR's - especially Gadsden - I think these guys hold the key to unlocking this team's top-20 potential.
Yeah, we're averaging a starter out for the season per game. Can't sustain that kind of misfortune; hopefully, injuries will quiet down from this point forward.Right now the injuries are a concern.
Believe me, I would love for you to be right. But I would be surprised if they don't figure things out between now and late October.Notre Dame is very bad this year.
Believe me, I would love for you to be right. But I would be surprised if they don't figure things out between now and late October.
I would normally agree but I've watched them quite a bit and, on offense at least, I don't know what there is to figure out. A - I think their talent on that side is way down and B - I think their OC misses Brian Kelly more than anyone. My thought/hope is they continue to get beat down by their schedule and stay a mess. I said we would sweep the state of Indiana at the start of the year and I still feel good about it.Believe me, I would love for you to be right. But I would be surprised if they don't figure things out between now and late October.
I think that we are a good solid team that if we win the turnover battle can beat any team remaining on the schedule. With the exception of Wagner and possibly BC we can also loose to any team remaining.We're 3-0, just beat a good Big Ten team and are on the verge of breaking into the rankings. That was one of the greatest games in the history of the Dome -and we won it!
But did your estimate of how good this team is increase or did it deflate a bit? We looked like a powerhouse beating what should be a pretty good Louisville team and steamrolled a bad Connecticut team. Against Purdue we couldn't run the ball. Shrader and the receivers looked like they did last year. the defense got burned several times. Those high snaps on the placekicks could cost us. Injuries are starting to pile up. Purdue would have won if they'd kept their mouths shut. But we gutted it out and made the plays to win the game anyway.
What did that do to your estimate of how good this team is? I'm very happy but also more concerned than I was before the game.