But if Pac 10 teams all lost early, you'd be saying they didn't deserve all those invites. Also it seems that the Big10 has the reputation as the best conference or 1 of the best but get teams losing early. Same for the ACC. It comes down to the P5 conferences get to many invites at the expense of the mid-majors. That said because of that "bias" has gotten SU in the last 3 times. Could it be that alot of the P5 teams don't take mid-majors seriously? Or in this case the "weak" Pac 12?I don't know that all this conference stuff means as much as its made out to during the tournament. So many factors go into who wins and by how much in these games. That includes a lot of random chance on 800 things. Sometimes those coin flips will align and it will somehow appear one conference or another has a major edge. Maybe they do, maybe not. If anything, I'd look at multiyear trends vs single year results. As an example, the single event results would tell us that Syracuse and FSU are the two best teams in the ACC. I don't know that we'd really think that is true.
This is amazing
It’s always hilarious when Holzhauer throws shade at Brad Rutter.
???So ESPN says this is the first time 2 PAC 12 schools have ever played in the NCAA tournament.
Maybe we ought to give Mike Hopkins a little slack?
He means there has never been a NCAA game between 2 current PAC-12 teams.???
LOL. Gotcha!He means there has never been a NCAA game between 2 current PAC-12 teams.
Like we played Duke in 2018 Sweet sixteen or North Carolina in 2016 Final Four or Marquette 2013 elite eight.
Oregon-USC are playing Sunday for a spot in the elite 8.