Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Spock344, post: 1653423, member: 4635"] Lastest version: [U]RPI_________W-L____SOS____(v. Top 50)__(v. Top 100)_RPI100+ losses[/U] #29 Colorado____16-7____49_____3-6______7-7________ 0 [B]#44 Syracuse___16-8___48____5-4_____7-7_______1[/B] # ?? Team A____16-6____82____1-3______4-5________1 # ?? Team B____17-6____104____1-4______3-5________1 It's understandable why Cuse would be below #29 with these numbers w/ the StJ debacle, as all other comparisons with Colorado are equal or better...If we had beaten StJ we'd clearly be #28 or higher (by the Colorado standard). Now compare SU to Teams A and B. Would it be a fair conclusion that both teams should be [I]below [/I]SU in the RPI, considering how they stack up, ? Apparently not... Team A: St Bonny - RPI #34 Team B: Wich. St - RPI #41 Yes, each team has a What loss. But apparently our What loss vastly outweighs our comparatively much better Top 50/100 wins and better SOS. Some BS right there... [/QUOTE]