GoSU96
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 21,878
- Like
- 43,105
In the Chancellor's previous communication it became kind of clear what the University's preferred options are:
The Silverdome's new owners claim that they're going with a steel supported roof. I'm skeptical of their plans and wouldn't be surprised to see the venue be torn down. Previous speculation on this board is that the Dome cannot support such weight and there's no room around the Dome for the installation of new supports required for such a roof.
- New stadium
- Major Dome upgrade with a different roof technology
That appears to leave a cable supported roof as possibly the preferred roof replacement option. The most obvious example of such a roof is the Georgia Dome. To make that work, one would expect the addition of snow melting capability to be required. Perhaps a double fabric layer with blown warm/hot air could work with such a design as well.
Replacing the current roof with another air-supported replacement is the least desired option. It remains as the easiest, proven, backup plan.
I believe that the University's preference is/was the the new stadium plan that's been getting the attention of late.
And they seem to be more than willing to trade having an on campus facility for a state of the art facility that they don't have to pay a dime of construction cost for. Seems pretty obvious that they have also done the analysis that shows they are better off giving up the revenues associated with running it vs the expenses and opportunity cost of having that real estate tied up.
For the people who are going to pay for it, having it on campus is a non starter. People have to give up that idea if they want a new stadium.