I don't know the stats about our success with it, but logic says it should work. With the 35 second college shot clock it's a significant advantage as long as the other team doesn't consistnetly score within 12 seconds of their shot clock
Obviously not the same, but a touch reminiscent of the old UNC 4-corners stall ball days long ago.
That stall thing always bothers me because I'm a big advocate of working for you shot the whole time and not the last few second panic to get a shot up to waste the clock. If you have smart enough players, you can work the clock while looking for a good shot and still be effective. I know that ain't Boeheim though and this is what he wants. I just hate seeing a good shot passed up only to see somebody fire up something desperate with 1-3 seconds left. or worse a turnover quick hoop because they had to force the issue.
The thing I don't like about it is that you got the lead playing one way, playing confident and aggressive, then you make a conscious decision to change that. You basically throw away the style that got you the lead by playing YOUR game, then you start playing timid. It's like watching a bad horror movie. "No, no, don't just hide in the closet!"