State of the State | Syracusefan.com

State of the State

GoSU96

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
21,654
Like
42,241
From 87 through 98 SU 1-22 could play for the most part with anyone in the country. Then the issue was quality depth. Injuries were a problem and were big factors in some of the disapointing losses, in particular the McNabb years. The drop off between the starters and depth was significant.

There was then the fall off in top end quality and the back end to the point where there were kids that shouldn't be on a BCS roster playing in this program.

What Marrone was able to do while he was here was build back up the roster 1-85 with D-1 players but almost to a man mid grade players. The top end impact players have been few and far between. There aren't any can't miss "5 tool" guys. At the same time there isn't a huge drop off beween the starters and their backups right now.

There isn't a LB with Archineaga's size and Davis' speed and explosiveness. Cam Lynch is a great run stopping downhill LB but he's 5-11 and has trouble playing in space. Spruill is the closest thing to an elite LB but with his stature should really be playing outside.

The speed and depth in the secondary has seen a tremendous upgrade but it's all about tradeoffs. Esk and Desir are very spindly for safeties, same with Whigs, tall but rail thin at corner, and Reddish and Morgan have speed but they looked like Smurfs out there yesterday. All these kids are tough, to a man look at where they come from, and they play hard, but they all have holes in their game, and some by nature are never going to be overcome. There was nothing Wayne Morgan could do yesterday on that fade, the WR was 6-5 234, and as was said on the broadcast, Wayne Morgan isn't.

You can't read too much into it but what was somewhat encouraging is that SU's two's hung in there against FSU's two's and three's. I get all the qualifiers about time, score, scheme, but it wasn't a complete physical mismatch.

All of the above being said the next step in the programs rebuild is start getting some kids that are closer to FSU's starters on the roster. Still a lot of work to do, but you can't let the blowouts cloud some of the progress accomplished this year. The defense has been as dominate in 1/2 the games as FSU was to SU yesterday and did enought to win the PSU game. The run game has been easily the best since the early 2000's with almost no help from the pass game and neither Smith or PTG are real top end talent. They are nice players and run hard, but are both limited. The OL hasn't been given near enough credit.

That is what MacDonald was brought in to get. Looks like he is getting that done outside at WR. Now lets get some 6-3 guys that play like Cam, and 6-1 corners that run and hit like Wayne Morgan.
 
GREAT post!

I think this year we have seen we more than hold our own against our peers - it is finding and landing the difference makers that will get us to the next level.

NW was early in the staffs tenure
GT was a learning lesson, as they over-thought the game plan for a unique offense.
Clemson and FSU were pure talent disparity

If we played PSU or NW the next two weeks, we could take them (IMO)

Pitt is the key - very winnable game ... do so and we are BOWL bound in year one of ACC and HCSS
BC will be tougher than most give credit for - they are improving weekly

We are in on some key playmakers in recruiting - I think the staff can land a few.
Next year we need more playmakers and also some depth on the OL to help us out in the next five years

This staff can and will do it.
 
Excellent post.

SU is in its 4th year of being fully capable of beating its peer set on any given Saturday. Meaning, mid-tier BCS programs.

I'm not terribly optimistic that we'll ever have a Baylor or Stanford-type season. The game had changed so much since the 90s. But that's OK. Our ceiling still means we can enjoy the program.
 
Excellent post.

SU is in its 4th year of being fully capable of beating its peer set on any given Saturday. Meaning, mid-tier BCS programs.

I'm not terribly optimistic that we'll ever have a Baylor or Stanford-type season. The game had changed so much since the 90s. But that's OK. Our ceiling still means we can enjoy the program.
We can have a Stanford season. For some reason meatheads don't say much about their losses


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
From 87 through 98 SU 1-22 could play for the most part with anyone in the country. Then the issue was quality depth. Injuries were a problem and were big factors in some of the disapointing losses, in particular the McNabb years. The drop off between the starters and depth was significant.

There was then the fall off in top end quality and the back end to the point where there were kids that shouldn't be on a BCS roster playing in this program.

What Marrone was able to do while he was here was build back up the roster 1-85 with D-1 players but almost to a man mid grade players. The top end impact players have been few and far between. There aren't any can't miss "5 tool" guys. At the same time there isn't a huge drop off beween the starters and their backups right now.

There isn't a LB with Archineaga's size and Davis' speed and explosiveness. Cam Lynch is a great run stopping downhill LB but he's 5-11 and has trouble playing in space. Spruill is the closest thing to an elite LB but with his stature should really be playing outside.

The speed and depth in the secondary has seen a tremendous upgrade but it's all about tradeoffs. Esk and Desir are very spindly for safeties, same with Whigs, tall but rail thin at corner, and Reddish and Morgan have speed but they looked like Smurfs out there yesterday. All these kids are tough, to a man look at where they come from, and they play hard, but they all have holes in their game, and some by nature are never going to be overcome. There was nothing Wayne Morgan could do yesterday on that fade, the WR was 6-5 234, and as was said on the broadcast, Wayne Morgan isn't.

You can't read too much into it but what was somewhat encouraging is that SU's two's hung in there against FSU's two's and three's. I get all the qualifiers about time, score, scheme, but it wasn't a complete physical mismatch.

All of the above being said the next step in the programs rebuild is start getting some kids that are closer to FSU's starters on the roster. Still a lot of work to do, but you can't let the blowouts cloud some of the progress accomplished this year. The defense has been as dominate in 1/2 the games as FSU was to SU yesterday and did enought to win the PSU game. The run game has been easily the best since the early 2000's with almost no help from the pass game and neither Smith or PTG are real top end talent. They are nice players and run hard, but are both limited. The OL hasn't been given near enough credit.

That is what MacDonald was brought in to get. Looks like he is getting that done outside at WR. Now lets get some 6-3 guys that play like Cam, and 6-1 corners that run and hit like Wayne Morgan.

Good post , I pretty much agree with everything you outlined. The hard part is going to actually be implementing this into our recruiting. You mentioned Smith and Gulley are good backs but not top end talent. This is correct but it also holds true for what we have on the roster and set for this class. Morris and Macfarlane seem like good backs but surely not top end talent. We didnt bring in a back last year and the only one we have committed is Phillips who admitted himself hes not a fan of power running and is 50-50 at best to qualify. WR and QB we appear to be in good shape (if everyone committed actually signs) and our LB class for next year looks promising but there are still a lot of question marks on this team and some of recruiting really needs to pick up.
 
It's nice to see some thoughtful analysis. No true fan was happy with the game yesterday and the results were beyond acceptable but "the sky is falling" and the "off with their heads" posts get real old real fast! It's all about prespective.
 
Great thread. I think a big recruiting key is to try & get some of these 2nd & 3rd stringers at schools like FSU, Clemson, etc to look at us and see that they could get a ton of PT right away. Most will still wait their turn (EO rings a bell) but to get a few of these guys every year would help. Thats what we did in the 80s and 90s and it payed dividends.
 
There is another thread about a QB being mandatory for success, which is probably a reasonable assumption assuming there are receivers to whom to throw. If we had a passing game this season would have been a different story.

For me, the most important attribute for a QB, after intelligence, is accuracy. It makes such a difference hitting receivers on the run, putting enough air under the ball on long passes and fitting throws into tight windows on intermediate patterns. An accurate passer makes receivers better than they otherwise might be.

That guy on our roster is Austin Wilson. I really have a feeling that Austin will beat out Hunt next year. Now, don't get me wrong, I like Hunt and I thin he will improve, but I think some of passing is in the DNA and all the practice in the world will not necessarily make you a much more accurate passer, especially with the long ball.

Wilson throws intermediate and long passes accurately and has touch. Contrary to popular opinion, I think he might be the guy.
 
Good post and I agree with everything you said. As for recruiting this staff seems to be putting a strong emphasis on speed, especially on the defensive side. It looks like they are giving in on size, if the recruit meets their speed standard. Perfect example is our secondary. We had a big kid (Jalen Williams) who was a Marrone offer, and would have committed if his offer was upheld. He is 6'2 205 right now, but only ran a 4.8 at camp. We didn't end up offering (he ended up choosing Pitt immediately after), but we brought in a faster/quicker guy in Rodney Williams. He is obviously faster, but is only about 5'10 175.
Our top 3 corner targets are as follows
5'11 168
5'11 170
5'10 175
but they all run 4.4 40's.

Speed was also emphasized at LBer as our 3 current LB commits are Marquis Spruill clones. The strength of all 3 is speed, even though we gave up some size.

Obviously Shafer has a plan on how he thinks we can attack these ACC spread offenses. It seems like an all or nothing approach, but I like it. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
 
SU needs to get the IPF going. The fact that there is nothing but plans to show the recruits is very concerning.

It's clear that SU is going to have to take kids who are either small (or slow) for their position. I'm happy to see Shafer going for the speed over the size. You have to hope some kids will grow into positions, but in today's college game, you need guys on both sides of the ball who can run. Morris and Lynch are good examples of guys that would have been at UGA if they were 2-3 inches taller.
 
SU needs to get the IPF going. The fact that there is nothing but plans to show the recruits is very concerning.

It's clear that SU is going to have to take kids who are either small (or slow) for their position. I'm happy to see Shafer going for the speed over the size. You have to hope some kids will grow into positions, but in today's college game, you need guys on both sides of the ball who can run. Morris and Lynch are good examples of guys that would have been at UGA if they were 2-3 inches taller.

I would love to know the real story what's going on with the IPF. Possibly a donor backing out?
 
Possibly never having all the money they need.

i assumed when they gave a start to finish time frame that they had all the money. plus why go through the charade of a ground breaking ceremony when there is a possibility you won't even start for another year or 2 ?
 
If that is the case, it falls on Gross. The increased revenue from the ACC should be enough to get this project going. Where is all the $ going?
 
If that is the case, it falls on Gross. The increased revenue from the ACC should be enough to get this project going. Where is all the $ going?

We haven't gotten a penny yet. And ACC money isn't going to pay for a building.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We haven't gotten a penny yet. And ACC money isn't going to pay for a building

From what I've heard, the SUAD admins didn't wait to start giving themselves raises. So, what is going on exactly?

I think it's time for DG (or his overpriced spokesperson) to provide some kind of update on the project. Would be nice if someone over at syracuse.com thought to ask the question instead of projecting Hickey's NFL future.
 
If that is the case, it falls on Gross. The increased revenue from the ACC should be enough to get this project going. Where is all the $ going?

I would confidently say that Gross wants the thing built as passionately as Jerome Smith's attempts to get get hay into the barn.
 
From what I've heard, the SUAD admins didn't wait to start giving themselves raises. So, what is going on exactly?

I think it's time for DG (or his overpriced spokesperson) to provide some kind of update on the project. Would be nice if someone over at syracuse.com thought to ask the question instead of projecting Hickey's NFL future.

I'm with you. Would like to know what's going on especially since they did the ground breaking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Speaking of Smith....not a knock on him be cause hes been pretty darn good, but I think DM and GM2 are going to be better.

But will they be as durable? It will be nice to have Smith back next year. He's had a decent year, but nothing that says NFL.
 
But will they be as durable? It will be nice to have Smith back next year. He's had a decent year, but nothing that says NFL.

Yep. Never did get the NFL talk with him.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,403
Messages
4,889,817
Members
5,996
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
251
Guests online
1,377
Total visitors
1,628


...
Top Bottom