Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 4155986, member: 5685"]
If I am SU I would be livid over the upper deck pricing model. It is embarrassing, and a head should roll. They can "fix it" and still save face by creating different premium sections.

The price differences lower bowl between A through D mostly make sense (although C to D is too small IMO). The pricing works because A is between the 40s, B 25 to 40, C 10 to 25, and D end zone to 10. But upper deck you have sections with A and B and C and D seating. There is little difference. We are talking 10 rows instead of 10 yards.

SU could keep A-D as is next season. Then in the upper deck have new levels E-H with pricing that makes sense. That way it doesn't seem like a mistake this season. Most stadiums are not going to charge the same for lower deck as upper anyway. I think SU does it out of ignorance or laziness.

Edit

They could rectify it this season if they really wanted to. Send out an email saying...

[I]It has come to our attention that there are inefficiencies in the upper deck pricing model. To rectify the situation we are adjusting to the following:

$125 sideline will remain $125
D will now be $225 instead of $300
C will now be $325 instead of $350
B will now be $425 instead of $500
A will now be $550 instead of $650[/I]

There is still a $300 price gap in some sections but SU is kinda stuck keeping those $125 tickets when they should have never been reduced in the 1st place. Next season if they go back to $225 then the problem can be solved.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?