higher than i would have expected.. I wonder what the line would have looked like had it come out last week.
-14?higher than i would have expected.. I wonder what the line would have looked like had it come out last week.
higher than i would have expected.. I wonder what the line would have looked like had it come out last week.
and its awaySo, we could beat UCannt 35-14, and they cover?
Can’t let that happen -
We coulda/woulda/shoulda put up 40+ vs Loserville, and they are 10x the team Storz is.
So, I’m calling for 44-10.
And the only reason they get a TD is late in the 2nd half vs our 2nd and 3rd string.
That's what happens when you look well coached in every position. Minus micues, that was the most competent Cuse team I've seen in years.higher than i would have expected.. I wonder what the line would have looked like had it come out last week.
I would genuinely like to know the last time SU was a 20+ point road favoriteYikes. I hate being such a favorite.
Didn’t look well coached on the OL. I have faith that will be corrected. Yeah I get that it’s a new system but that was awful. And we still smoked the birds.That's what happens when you look well coached in every position. Minus micues, that was the most competent Cuse team I've seen in years.
With the over under they are setting it as 38-17 Cuse, which seems very reasonableSo, we could beat UCannt 35-14, and they cover?
Can’t let that happen -
We coulda/woulda/shoulda put up 40+ vs Loserville, and they are 10x the team Storz is.
So, I’m calling for 44-10.
And the only reason they get a TD is late in the 2nd half vs our 2nd and 3rd string.
Penalty wise, yeah. But the blocking was solid. Especially liked how we were able to run it in from inside the 5 in the first half.Didn’t look well coached on the OL. I have faith that will be corrected. Yeah I get that it’s a new system but that was awful. And we still smoked the birds.