SU did not have taped convo for '05 investigation per spokesperson | Syracusefan.com

SU did not have taped convo for '05 investigation per spokesperson

Huge if true. But if not - why not? They didn't "have it" AND it wasn't mentioned in the BSK report?
 
If no one told them about it, how would SU have it?

This is a good thing.
 
BSK did not talk with ESPN or the PS? On the other hand, apparently ESPN did not feel compelled to bring the tape to the attention of the authorities, so why would they share it's existence with BSK?
 
big question: why not?

Nothing in this story makes sense. Davis never went to the police with the tape. Then he goes to SU wanting the school to investigate but doesn't provide the tape? Why would he not provide the tape to the TWO authorities who have the ability to act but did provide the tape to the two media outlets who cannot act? Unless it is fake, I cannot think of a reason.
 
Was he asked if there were tapes, emails, videos, etc.?
Do we know that, yet?
 
If we've learned nothing else; anything posted here as a rumor comes true. 100% accuracy rate so far. So I believe they didn't have the tape.
 
If the tape existed when the SU investigation went down, what was Davis' motive for not releasing the tape? Perhaps he felt it would be damaging to his "love interest" (Laurie Fine)?
 
This was the one fact I wanted the university to say of it was true.
 
Nothing in this story makes sense. Davis never went to the police with the tape. Then he goes to SU wanting the school to investigate but doesn't provide the tape? Why would he not provide the tape to the TWO authorities who have the ability to act but did provide the tape to the two media outlets who cannot act? Unless it is fake, I cannot think of a reason.
SPD blew him off with SOL. Why he wouldn't have provided it to SU begs questions.

Wouldn't you love to be able to ask 5 questions of each party in question? Nobody seems to ask relevant questions - yet.
 
If the tape existed when the SU investigation went down, what was Davis' motive for not releasing the tape? Perhaps he felt it would be damaging to his "love interest" (Laurie Fine)?

If that is the case then why give it to the PS or ESPN? If either ran the story in 2003 wouldn't that have been just as damaging?
 
SPD blew him off with SOL. Why he wouldn't have provided it to SU begs questions.

Wouldn't you love to be able to ask 5 questions of each party in question? Nobody seems to ask relevant questions - yet.

SPD blew him off because he didn't provide any details or proof. He then made the tape because he wanted proof. Once he had that proof, why not go back to the police?
 
If that is the case then why give it to the PS or ESPN? If either ran the story in 2003 wouldn't that have been just as damaging?
Forgot about the fact that the tape had been released to them. I give up on trying to keep track of all the twists and turns in this story. Next stop is JBs expected statement.
 
PeteThamelNYT Pete Thamel

SU spokesman: Bobby Davis did not provide the Laurie Fine audio tape when the university investigated his claims in 2005.

Now that we have that statement from the University wait until Wednesday and ESPN will produce the certified mail return receipt cards from the packages in which Davis alleges he shipped copies of the tape to BSK, Cantor and JB.
 
Now that we have that statement from the University wait until Wednesday and ESPN will produce the certified mail return receipt cards from the packages in which Davis alleges he shipped copies of the tape to BSK, Cantor and JB.

Plus a recording of him and Gross watching it together.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,631
Messages
4,902,127
Members
6,005
Latest member
CuseCanuck

Online statistics

Members online
273
Guests online
1,645
Total visitors
1,918


...
Top Bottom