Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SU94, post: 3739379, member: 202"] Well, it is not worthless, as it started a discussion. And I am pretty sure that more than once I made it pretty obvious my “King of” declaration was in jest. I also have dug up plenty of evidence, albeit circumstantial. That said, I do believe it to be true. So, it is a hypothesis, right? And yes, JAB had been around for a ~half century, but the lump sum of these comebacks have occurred this millennium, when the ingredients have been at peak: very good SU talent (not great, like the 80s and 90s), unique traits (zone/press), willingness to freelance or transition to new game plan, willingness to risk a huge or embarrassing loss to go for the long-shot win, shorter shot clock, lack of fundamentals the game, younger talent throughout the game. Correct, Boeheim is going to have the most as he’s coached so long. But SU is gonna at or near the top of any program. I might be able to track this down. Fingers crossed. [/QUOTE]