Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="LeMoyneCuse, post: 2249259, member: 158"]
I was a TV news producer, but I haven't been in the business for 7 years. And of course it's a story, and of course they should look into it. It's 100% something that the press should answer. I want answers as much as anyone else. Why the perceptions of bias on my part?

But if I learned anything as a mediocre journalist, it's that there's 2 sides to every story. I want to know Tucker's methodology, the administration's position, why players were DQed, why Syracuse is more conservative than other schools, what the process is, etc.

What I object to are the charges of incompetence and the belief that only bad things can happen. Yeah, the Clark situation has been bungled. But if specialists get the final word, that means you have different standards on whether a player is healthy enough to play from doctor to doctor. And what if a player has multiple issues? Who gets the final word, especially if they're connected? And what's the full extent of liability?

Mostly, I really object to the idea that there's somehow something inherently wrong with the administration every time any little thing doesn't go the way people want it to.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?