SuFTW
All Conference
- Joined
- May 13, 2020
- Messages
- 2,867
- Like
- 5,016
But there is nothing wrong with that.The timing of the announcement tells me it's part of the main plan.
But there is nothing wrong with that.The timing of the announcement tells me it's part of the main plan.
Posted in another thread but that is one of the major sticking points holding up final approval of the settlement. Hopefully it survives the April fairness hearings and certain resultant court battles.Also think it is worth noting that ALL other NIL contracts over $600.00 will need to be vetted through Deloitte for a fair market assessment.
This is going to be a very big deal and my guess is this would cut back on external NIL, in turn evening the playing field to a point.
The SEC (and it’s rogue booster culture) will take that as a challenge.Also think it is worth noting that ALL other NIL contracts over $600.00 will need to be vetted through Deloitte for a fair market assessment.
This is going to be a very big deal and my guess is this would cut back on external NIL, in turn evening the playing field to a point.
I don't see how that can pass legal muster. The Supremes have already ruled that NIL is outside the purview of the NCAA or any governing body - it's commerce between private parties. Just like the old days - if the local pizza joint wants to pay a player $100K to wash dishes, who can say otherwise?Also think it is worth noting that ALL other NIL contracts over $600.00 will need to be vetted through Deloitte for a fair market assessment.
This is going to be a very big deal and my guess is this would cut back on external NIL, in turn evening the playing field to a point.
Good for them. Maybe Michigan fans will be the first to stand up to this nonsense.Michigan is getting ready to pay the top football recruit in the country $12mil this year alone.