Are you suggesting that this staff isn't "laying the ground work on targets"? Maybe they're lazy.I disagree. The recruiting calendar has accelerated a great deal in the past 5 years alone. If you aren't making moves your falling behind. Not saying you need commits, but you need to be laying the ground work on targets you want cause you better believe the competition is.
Are you suggesting that this staff isn't "laying the ground work on targets"? Maybe they're lazy.
Just because they decided against a Jr Day and don't have a verbal in the commitment column (on March 1st, no less) certainly doesn't mean they're not working hard behind the scenes.
Texas is your classic example that early commits mean nothing. They usually have a dozen or more by June. Even lowly BC had a ton of early commits last year but still rated out in the 60's. Quality of the commit is far more important than numbers or what date they committed.
Do I hope we have 8-10 ten highly sought after or camp attendees commit by summer's end? Absolutely...but I'm certainly not going to stress over the lack of Jr Day or a verbals on March 1st. None of us...and I mean none of us have any idea what's going on in the coach's conference room or behind the scenes. So why sweat it?
Btw, if the NCAA institutes an early signing period I think that will force most schools into holding a Jr Day. Historically, Jr Days are held the day of the spring game which would be difficult for us because of anemic attendance. Maybe that's why you see various recruits attending practice sessions over the course of spring practice. Smaller numbers would allow the staff to be make the experience more personalized for each recruit.
one of the commits is already a non qualifier.
Really? Who are you referring to?
Prater
So how bad. Prep or JUCO?
Ever thought of forwarding this to HCSS and Eric White? Maybe they've never considered these things.First, to address my stress of the importance is Jr. Day's is mainly from a perception standpoint. Do you not agree we are still fighting a major perception battle? Honestly on a national stage I really think we are behind even BC in a perception standpoint. Whenever you have a chance to put your program out there you have to do it. Other then planning it really doesn't cost you anything, the recruits pay their way. I have to believe there are enough prospects with interest in NYS, and the 4-5 hour radius that would make it enough to be worthwhile. Prime example, RB Jonathan Forest from New Rochelle. He was just contacted by our staff last week. We want him to attend a camp to evaluate him for an offer. I have absolutely no problem with that. Only problem is that is in June. However he was at BC last weekend, is going to Maryland this weekend, and Rutgers the following. Who knows if he already isn't committed by then, and shuts things down? That goes into the other point about the accelerated calendar. Would you really feel comfortable coming out of the dead period, and needing 10 commits in the final 2 weeks to close out the class? I think it worked out pretty well for us this year, but we can't count on that every year. Luckily teams backed off Thomas and Dowels. Plus we still don't know for sure if Dowels will qualify, and one of the commits is already a non qualifier. You saw what happened when we missed on Rodney who we made a priority. Plus if your almost done with the class by then you have the opportunity to use one of our assets, the basketball team, as a way to attract some highly regarded prospects to a Jr Day that they may not have otherwise attended. Who knows once you get a kid on campus. Duke game would have been the perfect opportunity, but we were in scramble mode. That's what a few of our conference mates did the last weekend of the recruiting cycle...they had a Jr Day, which was their 1st of several. I like our staff as much as the next guy, but there is a reason all of these other programs have them.
Ever thought of forwarding this to HCSS and Eric White? Maybe they've never considered these things.
I'm sure they've considered these things. The problems lie in the feasibility and logistical realms.Ever thought of forwarding this to HCSS and Eric White? Maybe they've never considered these things.
I'm sure they've considered these things. The problems lie in the feasibility and logistical realms.
I'm sure they've considered these things. The problems lie in the feasibility and logistical realms.
Or not enough "want to and choose to support making it happen".Why can every other team make it happen but we can't?
Too many excuses, not enough make it happen.
I honestly believe that we'll see another attempt at a Jr Day when the IPF is complete. The first objective of any Jr Day is to give HS football players exposure to a school's facilities and staff.I definitely agree that is the main issue they are dealing with.
It's so easy to get a bunch of low income kids to pay over $1k to travel to upstate NY.
It's incredibly cheaper to fly direct to Logan Airport in Boston from anywhere else on the east coast than to fly to Hancock. Same with flying to Newark.I'll say it again. How does EVERY OTHER TEAM do it? Are we recruiting kids or face challenges that no other team has that make it incapable of having the event?
Nope. Just a lot of excuse making.