The reason I don't rank BMK higher than Melo based on this season's statistics is because we have a very small sample size. We have only gotten a brief glimpse of Melo the player (as opposed to Melo the injured zombie). If Melo stays long enough to give us a sizable sample, he will obviously outpace BMK in many important stats. And BMK is a stud too. I agree that Melo looked out of place against Colgate. He will look less out of place in the NBA next season.
Before Wes Johnson played a single game for the Cuse, almost every scout/pro personnel evaluator who had seen him knew he was a first rounder. Ditto for Melo, this season.
And we have seen this before from Dirty. Last season, there was a three game stretch against terrible competition against whom Dirty scored well. Against Colgate, Iona, and Morgan State, Southerland averaged 10.6 points and 5.3 rebounds a game with excellent percentages and efficiency. Most of the board began ranking Dirty as a better player than C.J. Fair at that time: but I did not. My opinion was that Dirty had simply put up good scoring numbers against weak competition, and I think that opinion was validated by the rest of James's season. I absolutely agree that James can improve (his quickness, handle, feel, vision, etc), but I do not see much improvement. He's a good player, but this team is just too stacked.
Anywho, there's no reason for controversy here. Most everyone understands that Dirty is on the outside looking in as far as being one of our best 6-7 players: points scored against Colgate notwithstanding. I'm glad to see him do well, but I suspect that Mookie could do almost as well if given a similar shot. And that is not meant as an insult to anyone. Mookie was a top recruit, and could have been a star, if not for our flood of awesome talent.
Melo was declared a first rounder by "almost every" scout before this season started? Really? I hadn't heard that. On what? Certainly not on any statistical analysis.
Entertain us please and give us James' stats and per 40's for this year, and then state why that doesn't show improvement. Thanks.Yea, Melo was very good over seas: 8.4 pts, 5.9 reb, 1.9 blk in 17 minutes a game.
per 40: 19.7 pts, 13.9 reb, 4.5 blocks, good stuff.
then great in the Cuse pre-season: 10.0 pts, 6.5 reb, 3.0 blk in 19.5 minutes a game.
per 40: 20.5 pts, 13.3 reb, 6.15 blocks.
At that point, before the season started, it became pretty clear that Melo had put his conditioning and injury issues from last year behind him, and had resumed a clear 1st rounder profile. Fab's skill set and size make him a default 1st rounder, he just has to avoid proving that he is not worth a 1st round pick. With his skill set and size, plus this athleticism and mobility, he basically just has to stay healthy. He doesn't have to be consistent or dominant to be a first rounder. BMK could pass Fab over and he'd still get Daniel Orton'ed so long as he stays healthy.
despite the egg vs Colgate, he has continued to be good so far this season:
6.5 pts, 5.8 reb, 2.3 blk in 18.8 minutes, per 40: 13.8 pts, 12.3 reb, 4.9 blocks (but 7.9 pf).
Entertain us please and give us James' stats and per 40's for this year, and then state why that doesn't show improvement. Thanks.
That is impressive, but obviously there is a possibility that he has simply been on a hot streak shooting against lousy competition (and aiding by some dunks against a team that couldn't get to half court). The possibility that this is simply a fluke against lousy talent is suggested by Southerland's body of work: over the course of his high school and college career, now spanning 8 years, Southerland has never been projected as a key player on a top team.