Full_Rebar
All American
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,073
- Like
- 4,213
If SU is so deficient when it comes to raising money, why isn't Gross hiring more people in that area, or being forced to hire more?
anomander said:They raised $40m with donations and suites. Think they are still working on the rest.
Why were the Bearcats playing in the Bengals stadium the other night? The stands looked really empty.Cincinnati is spending 80 million on a sick stadium upgrade.
Their stadium won't be ready till next season. I don't know if there is anywhere else they could play.Why were the Bearcats playing in the Bengals stadium the other night? The stands looked really empty.
Note: announced attendance was 19K.
I don't understand your assertion that Cin. has a "better incoming class even as an American Athletic member".Cincinnati cares about its football program. Which is why they have better facilities, a better staff, more wins, and better incoming class even as an American Athletic member.
Amazing that school could raise $40M for its football program. They must have convinced people to donate the money they save by never attending their Paul Brown games. And then keep scheduling more games there.
Cincinnati is spending 80 million on a sick stadium upgrade.
I hear the talking heads on sports radio laugh at the callers every time they say SU should hire a big name coach to create a buzz in town about the football program. Well I hope they are watching ESPN2 tonight. Maybe they can explain to their listeners how the University of Cincinnati Bearcats were able to hire someone like Tommy Tuberville last season even though they are in the AAC but Syracuse fans should never expect someone of his caliber to come here. Tuberville's offense put up over 400 yards in offense on ECU in the first half and he has a 14-7 record in year # 2 with the Bearcats.
We are making money in the ACC that was completely unimaginable 5 years ago and we still pay our football coaches peanuts. If the school was really serious about winning, they would reinvest some of that money. Maybe they are doing that but with things besides coaching, IDK the inner workings of the athletic department. However, from where I sit we are making triple now and spending the same (and we were not exactly broke before), so who is pocketing all that $$$?
Edited to add something somewhat related: I aggravates me to no end that pretty much every northeast school hires conservative, mostly defensive coaches, as their head coaches.
We are making money in the ACC that was completely unimaginable 5 years ago and we still pay our football coaches peanuts. If the school was really serious about winning, they would reinvest some of that money. Maybe they are doing that but with things besides coaching, IDK the inner workings of the athletic department. However, from where I sit we are making triple now and spending the same (and we were not exactly broke before), so who is pocketing all that $$$?
Edited to add something somewhat related: I aggravates me to no end that pretty much every northeast school hires conservative, mostly defensive coaches, as their head coaches.
I too would love to know where this money is going? There might be a very justifiable explaination but as I had mentioned in earlier posts we have the lowest paid coaching staff in the ACC and are now making over $20 mill more than in previous years (when we were in the Big East)? Also, I believe a few weeks back there was a thread ranking Athletics revenue which pointed out that Syracuse will be top 30 (?) in the country when its all said and done? So why are we not investing in what has the biggest potential as a revenue generator for the Athletic Department (as it is in most P5 AD's across the country), the football program? Maybe I am missing something, I honestly mean that, or do not have all the facts but I would love to hear some thoughts/opinions on this matter.
Because the BBall team wins, Boehiem being severely underpaid doesn't seem to bother anyone.
Because the BBall team wins, Boehiem being severely underpaid doesn't seem to bother anyone.
Some places would have to pay more than others, but I generally agree. We just need to be committed to winning.Syracuse can hire a big name if they open the checkbook. At the end of the day everything is about money.
I don't understand your assertion that Cin. has a "better incoming class even as an American Athletic member".
I just checked with Rivals' SU and Cin. commit lists. I understand that star ratings are subjective and are a snapshot, but SU has 9 *** and 13 ** while Cin. has 8 *** and 11**. The classes seem pretty even to me.
Are you saying we should pay the current staff more just for appearances?
If and when guys start leaving because of pay then it will be an issue. That hasn't happened since the late 90's.
If you are talking about opening the aperture as spots come open, no problem.
Perles left for more money.
At this point I just want winning football, to me that is not boring, ever. I have nothing against Tressel, if he can deliver wins. That is open to debate, but he at least would be an experienced head coach with a large aquaintance pool to draw assistants from.I believe I mentioned Petrino for SU and got shouted down by the self righteous on this board. The only reason I'm not a fan of Tressel is that his brand of football is Boring. Not sure what kind of recruiter he would be, he's never really had to do it at the FBS level. At OSU you don't recruit, you select.
What has the current staff done to justify a pay raise?