LeMoyneCuse
All American
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 7,493
- Like
- 16,496
They were never able to put another tandem like Merk and Holmes on the field at the same time.Our best defense under Shafer was 2010. That defense single handedly won games.
They were never able to put another tandem like Merk and Holmes on the field at the same time.Our best defense under Shafer was 2010. That defense single handedly won games.
So pressure from everywhere, like Shafer and Bullough stopped doing because the secondary couldn't get in position and they needed the linebackers to help in coverage?In the new scheme then they should take more risks and be more aggressive.
Yes more pressure. Throw everything at them. If they score fast , you comeback and score fast . By the second half your conditioning should win . Scores of 80-70 is what you looking for. It's like Keyesian monetary policy applied to college football.So pressure from everywhere, like Shafer and Bullough stopped doing because the secondary couldn't get in position and they needed the linebackers to help in coverage?
Make points quickly and drive up inflated scores?Yes more pressure. Throw everything at them. If they score fast , you comeback and score fast . By the second half your conditioning should win . Scores of 80-70 is what you looking for. It's like Keyesian monetary policy applied to college football.
What ever it takes to get to the point where your conditioning program puts your team into the position of having the better athletes on the field at that time. A fatigued 4 star is not as good as a 3 star guy who still play at his peak. At least I think that's what the theory says. Late in the game you can score TD's in under a minute and that's when you win.Make points quickly and drive up inflated scores?
A fatigued Mike Williams(2-star) was alot better than a rested Lobdell(4-star). FWIW, I just read another article about the flawed star-system. It showed that something like 5 of Bama's recruits this year got instant star 'bumps' after committing to Bama. There was no further evaluation, nothing expect a verbal to a factory. It went into detail about how these rating services stay alive through the relationships they have with certain factories and their donors. They don't want to be caught giving the illusion that one of these moneymakers is having a bad recruiting season as that could potentially lead to a bad financial season for the rating service.What ever it takes to get to the point where your conditioning program puts your team into the position of having the better athletes on the field at that time. A fatigued 4 star is not as good as a 3 star guy who still play at his peak. At least I think that's what the theory says. Late in the game you can score TD's in under a minute and that's when you win.
But what happens when you play a team that's in as good of shape as you are? You can't tell me that we'd be at an advantage against Clemson because our players are equally tired.What ever it takes to get to the point where your conditioning program puts your team into the position of having the better athletes on the field at that time. A fatigued 4 star is not as good as a 3 star guy who still play at his peak. At least I think that's what the theory says. Late in the game you can score TD's in under a minute and that's when you win.
CousCuse said:The new offense only gives an advantage against teams with superior athletes on their defense when you have worn them down , do to better conditioning. If the opposing offense can possess the ball for long drives you never get that point .
CousCuse said:This has nothing to do with Shafer. This is about the thesis of employing superior conditioning to wear down better athletes so that later in the game your not as highly rated athletes are more capable of still sustaining play and are superior.
yea -- wasnt it like opponents were 15 - 21 on fourth down against us and an absurd 50% chance of 1st on a 3rd and 10+?Any defense has to be better than the "opponents are x for x going for it on 4th down for the season," and the "50/50 shot they're going to get the 1st on 3rd and 15" defenses we've employed for the last two years.
a fatigued (and puking) donovan mcnabb is better than anything we have had sinceA fatigued Mike Williams(2-star) was alot better than a rested Lobdell(4-star). FWIW, I just read another article about the flawed star-system. It showed that something like 5 of Bama's recruits this year got instant star 'bumps' after committing to Bama. There was no further evaluation, nothing expect a verbal to a factory. It went into detail about how these rating services stay alive through the relationships they have with certain factories and their donors. They don't want to be caught giving the illusion that one of these moneymakers is having a bad recruiting season as that could potentially lead to a bad financial season for the rating service.

I would've been interested to see Shafer's D with the better athletes that Babers will be able to recruit.
Or Ithaca. (That's where his son plays, right? My comment isn't at all funny if it isn't.)So would Maryland.
NC State and Wake are exactly the type of teams we need to beat this season if we want to go bowling!Clemson and FSU will eat it up. But will they be able to stop us? (Not joking, see year two of this offense)
NC State and Wake might not like us very much.
Would be interesting to see if he ever ends up back at Michigan.Shafer is a great D coach. I expect him to be back coaching and to do great things. He made some major mistakes with hires on the O side and caught a terrible break with the QB injuries.
Would be interesting to see if he ever ends up back at Michigan.
Guidice looks pretty sturdy.Tyler Cross looks like he just stepped out of a J Crew catalog. Isn't it hot out?! Love the swag.
Edit to stay on topic: Really excited to see the Tampa 2 in action. I don't know much about it (this thread has been a nice education). Just hope we can generate enough pressure on the QB.
Guidice looks pretty sturdy.