Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RandomGuy, post: 3914549, member: 6422"]
Sure. Why not?   The SEC wants to control college football.  Only the B10 can push back($$). I'd suspect the B10 doesn't want to relinquish control, and therefore will develop their own super conference.   They are the only ones, other than the SEC, that can do it.  When that is decided? They will work in lock step with the SEC, for that common purpose.

I'm basing this on pending legislation(7 proposed bills to pay players), and the likely future landscape of college sports.  The entire reason for Texas and OU's move, imo.

Clemson, FSU, etc.  will move to a football "super conference."  Dead weight will be cut, and the top 32 teams, or so will be IN.   Not us, I'm afraid. For this argument? If you want to hold out hope for Cuse football, we are #5 in ACC football revenue.  (We're still pretty awesome fans)

From a business perspective, I just think it makes sense for an NFC/AFC type model.  Any Cuse; WVU, Butgurls rivalry's, can still be maintained at a lower level - with profits.  The top teams will just manage a heck of a lot more profit.

I suspect there is a board lawyer out there.    My question is:   IF the ncaa relinquishes control.  IF federal law demands a player share in profits...   What happens with the contracts now that the building blocks of those contracts have been completely torn down?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?