If each team had 3 guaranteed opponents each year this is how I think it would look.
Syracuse- Boston College, Pitt, Louisville
This could work I like itCurrent divisions were designed to preserve rivalries, so the best option might be to divide up the current divisions geographically:
Atlantic South: Clemson, FSU, NC State, Wake
Coastal South: Duke, GT, Miami, UNC
Atlantic North: BC, Louisville, Syracuse, +1
Coastal North: Pitt, UVa, VT, +1
Maybe swap Miami and UVa.
There could be one or two permanent or preferred opponents as well.
This would just be the 3 protected games. I get we want sexy games and we would likely get those in the remaining 5 or 6 conference games each year. However, we Syracuse fans have to realize we are on the bottom of the totem pole and those are the teams we have the most history with so they would make sense for our protected rivalry games. Plus, I don't want to have to play Clemson, Miami, Florida State each year and practically beg to go 1-2 in those 3 games I want some games we can win and build momentum.Does not excite me....lol
This would just be the 3 protected games. I get we want s e x y games and we would likely get those in the remaining 5 or 6 conference games each year. However, we Syracuse fans have to realize we are on the bottom of the totem pole and those are the teams we have the most history with so they would make sense for our protected rivalry games. Plus, I don't want to have to play Clemson, Miami, Florida State each year and practically beg to go 1-2 in those 3 games I want some games we can win and build momentum.
I agree with this I made this post in the past.
ACC
Pod 1
Syracuse
Boston College
Louisville
Cincinnati/West Virginia
Pod 2
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Pittsburgh
Notre Dame
Pod 3
North Carolina
Duke
North Carolina State
Wake Forest
Pod 4
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Miami
Clemson
You would play your pod, and another pod completely, and then teams that finished in the same spot as you did the previous year a la the NFL.
This could work I like it
South and North could rotate over a 4 yr period where you would play each school every 4 years.
I would do it Atlantic North- BC, Syracuse, Louisville
Coastal North- Miami, Pitt, VPI
Atlantic South- Clemson, FSU, NC State, Wake
Coastal South- Georgia Tech, Duke, UNC, UVA
Each North team would get 1 protected game
BC-Miami, Syracuse-Pitt, Louisville-VPI and just grandfather UVA-VPI, FSU-Miami, Clemson-Georgia Tech, UNC-NCSU,Wake-Duke and rotate the remaining north and south divisional games.
The Pac-12 has grandfathered games nobody talks about USC and UCLA play Stanford and Cal each year even though they are in different divisions it was done in exchange for USC and UCLA agreeing to equal revenue sharing. Those 4 California schools have 7 of their 9 conference games scheduled automatically each year this is something the ACC could do.
This is very well thought out and not something I have seen before. You would be playing 6 automatic opponents each year and still get great diversity in conference matchups. In the future when I think of pods I will use your model because I like it a lot.I was thinking about how to put things together after I posted "my" pod system. I kind of "rotated" how most people put the pods together by 90 degrees.
Line 1 - The Four Traditional Powers - FSU, Miami, ND, Clemson
Line 2 - The Carolina Mafia - Wake, NC State, UNC, Duke
Line 3 - The Lambert Trophy Teams - SU, BC, Navy (if they're #16) or Pitt, Pitt or #16 (if it's not Navy)
Line 4 - The Guys Toward the Middle - VPI, UofL, UVa, Ga Tech
Now to construct the Pods, each Pod gets a team from each line:
Pod A - FSU, Wake, SU, VPI
Pod B - Miami, NC State, BC, UofL
Pod C - ND, UNC, Navy/Pitt, UVa
Pod D - Clemson, Duke, Pitt/#16, Ga Tech
You play everyone in your pod and everyone on your line every year. This accomodates who everyone wants/has to play, tries to keep travel costs reasonable, and still lets you play in all parts of the ACC.
My thinking was rotating the Atlantic and Coastal teams like you suggest and just have the pods of 3 have protected 1 game between each other to make games even up, but Hoo's That idea for dividing up 16 team pods when it happens just makes to much sense for it not happen.I was thinking of the plus +1 as a fourth team, but yes it could be an extra protected game as well in a 14 team (4-4-3-3) pod system. Since there would only be two possible permutations in that circumstance, the cross-divisional games presumably would be against the other like-sized pod - meaning Syracuse would also play two out of the three coastal north teams every year, perhaps with Pitt permanent, and rotating between Miami and VPI. That would put BC, Louisville, and Pitt on the schedule every year, and every other team on alternating years.
This is very well thought out and not something I have seen before. You would be playing 6 automatic opponents each year and still get great diversity in conference matchups. In the future when I think of pods I will use your model because I like it a lot.
Under Hoo's modelWith six permanent opponents, there isn't any more diversity than what we have now. No divisions either.