The all-inclusive Rutgers dumpster fire thread... | Page 537 | Syracusefan.com

The all-inclusive Rutgers dumpster fire thread...

They are celebrating The Insight.com bowl Victory from 20 years ago on their board like it was a National Championship. They are so ratchet and desperate to be relevant.

But JHJ, Rutgers had that time when...

Oh, and the time that...

Once, there was a time that...

And how can we forget the time when...

I got nothing. Continue the march, Rutgers sucks. But hey, when your best bowl performance is a loss, I mean, celebrate away.
 
They are celebrating The Insight.com bowl Victory from 20 years ago on their board like it was a National Championship. They are so ratchet and desperate to be relevant.

The irony is we look down upon our insight bowl WIN in the disgust because we got screwed out of the gator bowl.
 
Do yourselves a favor and go get a Heart Calcium Score Test. Non invasive, quick test with CT scan that can be done without ins for as little as $99 that can early detect heart disease, risk for heart attacks etc.
Yep. I didn't know it was a thing until my PA suggested it. I have a family history of heart disease with both parents having high cholesterol, and both having had bypass surgery, they've passed those awesome genetics to me. Fortunately, my score was zero, so I'm good for now.
 
They are celebrating The Insight.com bowl Victory from 20 years ago on their board like it was a National Championship. They are so ratchet and desperate to be relevant.

Getting to a bowl game and losing is as close as Buttgers will ever get to a national championship!
 
Rutgers has been losing football games longer than all but one other team.
Don't be using facts to pummel Rutgers into reality! 😉

Princeton:

860–423–50

Rutgers:

679–702–42

Both teams went 1-1 in 1869, sharing the NC, though Princeton would win the tie-breaker if the tie-breaker rules were in effect based on points scored by each team. Parke Davis named the two as co-champions decades after the fact.

 
Rutgers at B.Y E., today. The Scarlet Frights' offense was anemic, today. Then couldn't get the running game going. They couldn't get the passing game going. Even the kicking game was useless.

I all fairness to B.Y.E., the Fighting BYEs were well prepared this week. The Fighting BYEs held Rutgers scoreless through all four quarters, leaving Rutgers with a goose egg, something which with Rutgers fans are well acquainted.

The fans never showed for this game. Rutgers has never been a draw, anywhere, the Fighting BYES could not get fans in the stands for this game if they have a way to jets for free. Frankly, I am not sure why B.Y.E. would schedule Rutgers, but here we are. Rutgers did demand at least one home game in Jersey in return for three home games at B.Y.E. home field, otherwise known as the Grinding Gridiron.

To give a Rutgers some due, this B.Y.E. team has yet to beat anyone of significance, but then, Rutgers has never been of significance. I guess we have to give it to Rutgers for a defense mediocre enough to keep B.Y. E.'s offense from scoring. Not that this is a major feat, but as Shady's calling card extolls his defensive "genius" he should get some credit for keeping the lowest scoring offense in CFBdom to zero points. The game was called after regulation in a 0-0 tie due to a lack of interest. I am not sure how this will be reflected in the record books but it will always be a black mark that Rutgers was held scoreless by the worst defense.

As usual, anything with Rutgers is generally no worthy of report.
 
As of October 7, 2025, it has been 672 weeks since the Rutgers Scarlet Knights Football team was last ranked in the Associated Press Football poll. Keep Choppin.
College Sports Mascots GIF by College Colors Day
 
{snip

Both teams went 1-1 in 1869, sharing the soccer NC, though Princeton would win the tie-breaker if the tie-breaker rules were in effect based on points scored by each team. Parke Davis named the two as co-champions decades after the fact.

FIFY. What would be recognized today as football didn't happen until Harvard played McGill in 1874.
 
Don't be using facts to pummel Rutgers into reality! 😉

Princeton:

860–423–50

Rutgers:

679–702–42

Both teams went 1-1 in 1869, sharing the NC, though Princeton would win the tie-breaker if the tie-breaker rules were in effect based on points scored by each team. Parke Davis named the two as co-champions decades after the fact.

The game in 1869 might have been the first intercollegiate athletic event but it was not a football game.

They had 30 players playing in both teams.

They used a soccer ball.

There were no goal lines and you scored by getting the ball into a soccer goal.

You could not pick the ball up and run. The ball was advanced by kicking it or hitting it with your arm or hand.

It was a weird type of soccer where hand balls were legal. But that was what was done in those days.

When McGill came to play American colleges in 1874, they insisted in playing rugby instead. They brought played with oblong ball and players could advance the ball by holding it and running. There was tackling and punting. I still wouldn’t call it football, but rugby is a lot closer to American football than soccer is.

They were still playing essentially with rugby rules when Princeton and Yale played a huge game in 1881. Both were undefeated and the game would determine the unofficial national champion for that season.

But neither team tried to score. The game draw a big crowd of people who paid to watch and they were disgusted by this strategy. In those days, you could possess the ball indefinitely and the schools just burned clock, happy to get a tie and a share of a championship. There were no downs, there was no line of scrimmage, there was no break between plays to call a new play.

It still was rugby; not football.

This game was such a farce, it caused some rule changes to happen. Walter Camp, who had just finished his career at Yale as a player, proposed a series of changes that really differentiated American football from rugby. The whole concept of a line of scrimmage, which separated teams, lining up before each play, 3 downs to make 5 yards or you must punt…all that stuff was put in for the 1882 season to make the game more interesting.

I don’t know what the first college game played in 1882 was, but I would argue this is when college football really began.

 
The game in 1869 might have been the first intercollegiate athletic event but it was not a football game.

They had 30 players playing in both teams.

They used a soccer ball.

There were no goal lines and you scored by getting the ball into a soccer goal.

You could not pick the ball up and run. The ball was advanced by kicking it or hitting it with your arm or hand.

It was a weird type of soccer where hand balls were legal. But that was what was done in those days.

When McGill came to play American colleges in 1874, they insisted in playing rugby instead. They brought played with oblong ball and players could advance the ball by holding it and running. There was tackling and punting. I still wouldn’t call it football, but rugby is a lot closer to American football than soccer is.

They were still playing essentially with rugby rules when Princeton and Yale played a huge game in 1881. Both were undefeated and the game would determine the unofficial national champion for that season.

But neither team tried to score. The game draw a big crowd of people who paid to watch and they were disgusted by this strategy. In those days, you could possess the ball indefinitely and the schools just burned clock, happy to get a tie and a share of a championship. There were no downs, there was no line of scrimmage, there was no break between plays to call a new play.

It still was rugby; not football.

This game was such a farce, it caused some rule changes to happen. Walter Camp, who had just finished his career at Yale as a player, proposed a series of changes that really differentiated American football from rugby. The whole concept of a line of scrimmage, which separated teams, lining up before each play, 3 downs to make 5 yards or you must punt…all that stuff was put in for the 1882 season to make the game more interesting.

I don’t know what the first college game played in 1882 was, but I would argue this is when college football really began.


But, what if all you have for your whole existence in the sport of college football, over a hundred years, is the claim that you are the birthplace?
 
But, what if all you have for your whole existence in the sport of college football, over a hundred years, is the claim that you are the birthplace?
Super interesting!!!

so...lol...here me out

Rutgers is like that old high-school baseball field dugout?

It's where college football was conceived.

It was birthed later in 1882 at a real school.
 
Super interesting!!!

so...lol...here me out

Rutgers is like that old high-school baseball field dugout?

It's where college football was conceived.

It was birthed later in 1882 at a real school.
OOOOORRRRRRR...Rutgers was a misscariage and the 1882 was the successful birth?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,561
Messages
5,168,773
Members
6,140
Latest member
Scooter#23

Online statistics

Members online
215
Guests online
1,448
Total visitors
1,663


...
Top Bottom