The Downside- Clemzin | Syracusefan.com

The Downside- Clemzin

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,979
Like
65,541
- I know we never expected to win there and that Clemson had a great defense but it’s still frustrating to be so completely punchless and let one opportunity after another go by while the game slipped away. By opportunity, I don’t necessarily mean golden scoring opportunity: I mean getting stops on Clemson and being in a positon where a scoring drive could give us control of the game or get back into it. We just had nothing, and it wasn’t a mighty cool hand.



- I guess the AL Long for Heisman campaign will have to wait a couple of years. He was 12 for 27 for 82 yards and two interceptions. Including sacks, he ‘carried” 10 times for -14 yards, giving him a total offense of 68 yards to go with his 55.14 passer rating. Actually I give the kid a pass. He was a true freshman starting only for the second time against one of the best defenses in the country and surrounded by a team that was hardly very dynamic to begin with. He’s a guy who should probably be redshirting but we need him now so he’s out there. His previous performances were competent at best which was impressive for a true freshman, (and an upgrade over what Hunt was giving us). We wasn’t really dazzling and I don’t know that he’s really “the guy”. Let’s save the judgment for 2015 or maybe 2016.


- He wasn’t getting much help from Tim Lester. The offensive concept was understandably conservative with an inexperienced quarterback against a such a strong defense but we kept running the ball up the middle on second and third and long, which did us no good. I’m not down on Lester at this point but the jury is very much out on him as it must be on Long.


- It all added up to a 3 for 16 performance on third down and a second half performance, if that’s the word, of 53 yards and 3 first downs. While Clemson possessed the ball for 21 minutes and 16 seconds, including the last 8:17.


- Field positon was not our friend in this one. On our first seven possessions we had between 75 and 92 yards to go to score the first seven times and had an average of 84 yards. For the game we averaged 73 yards to go. Clemson averaged 67, which doesn’t sound like a big difference except it meant that they didn’t have to create 82 yards of offense to score that we did. Sicne they were ahead 375-170 in total offense, it still mattered. We ahd three drives of more than five plays.


- What happened to our new ace receiver, Steve Ismael? He never caught a pass. Meanwhile Ashton Broyld continued to drop them. He did catch 4 of them but more than halfway through his junior year, he’s still r scored a single touchdown for Syracuse. It was against Stoney brook, two years ago.


- If a guy was down it was likely a Syracuse guy, as it has bene all year. I don’t believe we were faking to slow them down, although some of those guys came back into the game. Brisley Estime got hurt again. Does it ever end?


- Cole Murphy has done a good job, (11 of 13 FG this year including a 50 yarder today). But that missed 42 yarder basically eliminated any chance to win this one.


- The concept of a moral victory is a ridiculous one. What they are really talking about is that each game has two results: the score and the expectations created for future games. You can come close to beating or at least compete well against a superior team and create hopes that future victories will come from such performances against lesser teams. As with the Florida State game, we competed much better against this team than last year but with the offense being so pathetically bad, I’m not sure that much confidence about future games was manufactured tonight.
 
In a game like (low expectations for a road win), I look for the potential of the team, and of individual players, to get better. To get better this season, or next.
The stand-outs yesterday were all seniors (West, PTG, Reddish), and the defense in general for forcing take-aways. Broyld was a positive factor (getting open for 4 catches is a lot better than anyone other than West), and Phillips and AAM both contributed on (rare) occasions.
But, if we are to make a run in November, we absolutely need more from the QB position. Long is a true frosh -- cut him some slack. But he can't play like that if we are to have a shot at a bowl. Can't blame Lester -- he is limited by what he has at the QB position. Sorry if this is harsh.
 
Last nights game looked like the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Minnesota Vikings Super Bowl game and even had the exact same score which honestly freaked me out because I thought of this during half time. The offense looked like they were playing vs the Steel Curtain and the field was tipped up 45 degrees when SU was on offense.

The kids played hard for 60. I was worried about Longs height and it showed plus his inexperience. On the plus side this will be the toughest defense he will have to face. I thought SU should have used more of a power game but maybe with the injuries they couldn't. The outside runs were foolish with the speed of the Clemson D. The crowd booing our kids getting hurt...even on offense? you Clemson.
 
Last nights game looked like the Pittsburgh Steelers vs Minnesota Vikings Super Bowl game and even had the exact same score which honestly freaked me out because I thought of this during half time. The offense looked like they were playing vs the Steel Curtain and the field was tipped up 45 degrees when SU was on offense.

The kids played hard for 60. I was worried about Longs height and it showed plus his inexperience. On the plus side this will be the toughest defense he will have to face. I thought SU should have used more of a power game but maybe with the injuries they couldn't. The outside runs were foolish with the speed of the Clemson D. The crowd booing our kids getting hurt...even on offense? you Clemson.


I was going to add to the Upside "this is the toughest defense we will have to face". To prove that, I looked at the NCAA stats:
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/22
Then I saw that Boston College and Pittsburgh were on the same page. In fact, Pitt was ranked ahead of Clemson when I looked at it last night, (they couldn't handle UNC- but we don't have UNC's offense). So I guess that point belongs on the Downside, rather than the Upside.
 
I was going to add to the Upside "this is the toughest defense we will have to face". To prove that, I looked at the NCAA stats:
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/22
Then I saw that Boston College and Pittsburgh were on the same page. In fact, Pitt was ranked ahead of Clemson when I looked at it last night, (they couldn't handle UNC- but we don't have UNC's offense). So I guess that point belongs on the Downside, rather than the Upside.

I have it on the downside because SU is so beat up and has them at 3-5 (the past) but you are right it could be the upside as well.
 
Oh and I want to add what could have been the turning point of this game. 2, not 1 holding penalty of a kick off return that garnered what...15 yards? This pushed a struggling offense even further back and set up Clemson for a short drive. To me...the breaking point of the game.
 
I've been pleased overall with the transition of the offense since Lester took over however I have to question when our top two backs rush for 96 yards on only 20 carries but yet they only got 1/3 of the overall offensive plays (62 total). Also as you noted, SWC, they seemed to get the call on 2nd and 3rd down after we squandered our 1st downs on passing/lateral plays.

I would love to have seen the outcome if those two combine for 35-40 carries, heavily skewed to between the tackles.
 
I don't think of myself as "that guy," but when Broyld caught his second or third early pass, I said "This is awesome, but he's just setting himself up to alligator-arm an important pass down the stretch."

We need someone more sure-handed on the field.
 
I don't think of myself as "that guy," but when Broyld caught his second or third early pass, I said "This is awesome, but he's just setting himself up to alligator-arm an important pass down the stretch."

We need someone more sure-handed on the field.

He's not a running back or a pass receiver. He's a QUARTERBACK. But don't tell anybody.
 
He's not a running back or a pass receiver. He's a QUARTERBACK. But don't tell anybody.

I think he's a basketball player. And probably one who'd prefer to stay on the perimeter.
 
I don't think of myself as "that guy," but when Broyld caught his second or third early pass, I said "This is awesome, but he's just setting himself up to alligator-arm an important pass down the stretch."

We need someone more sure-handed on the field.

It still makes me laugh when people say he should be playing linebacker. He's a big fast kid but he hates any contact.
 
One more for the downside:

Jamal Custis. Coaching staff, you get an for the use of this kid. He's totally been Johnnie Moranted.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,344
Messages
4,885,825
Members
5,992
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
178
Guests online
991
Total visitors
1,169


...
Top Bottom