The Downside - Virginia Tech | Syracusefan.com

The Downside - Virginia Tech

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,867
Like
65,309
- It was a valiant effort, as JB said, but your record isn’t “wins losses and valiant efforts”. It’s supposed to be a valiant effort – to win. But it’s a loss. We need to go 4-2 now to clinch a winning season during the regular season. 3-3 gets us to 16-15 but we could go 0-1 in the ACC tournament.

- I didn’t really expect to win this one but we didn’t lose it for the reasons I thought we’d lose it. I thought tech might go off from three on us, as they did against Florida State, (18 of 23), but, after an early barrage, they really didn’t. We out-shot them from three, 10/27 vs. 8/27. And I thought they’d foul out our centers and we’d wind up with Jimmy in the middle but Frank and Bourama played all 40 minutes and Frank played a heck of a game. We lost because:

- Our Forwards, Cole Swider and Jimmy Boeheim, scored 10 points in the first 7:36 and just four points after that, all from Cole. They were a combined 6 for 22 from the field and Cole was 0 for 5 from the arc. I think the absence of Jesse Edwards’ offensive threat allowed Tech to push up on the forwards and take them out of the game.

- We had 2 points off takeovers. Tech had 17. In ACC games we have 156 points from 153 takeovers. Our opponents have 214 from 155. I think that speaks to team speed. They can get downcourt and we can’t to cover them.

- Fouls: 18-9, free throws: 4-21. I can’t remember a game before this in which we score 1 point from the foul line.

- We were up 26-24 with 4:31 left in the first half and then suffered an 0-11 run that began with 3 straight turnovers. We wound up with four turnovers and were 0 for 4 from the field in that run. With 6:18 left in the game, we struggled back to 54-54 and then gave up another 0-11 run. That one began with a turnover but that was the only one in that stretch. The problem was we were 0 for 8 from the field and 0 for 2 from the foul line. The fact that both runs occurred late in halves make you wonder is fatigue was a factor. A lot of those missed shots were short. That ball gets heavy when you are tired.

- Buddy Boeheim was our leading scorer with 21 points but he’s 14 for 38 in his last two games. He’s 6 for 19 from three but he’s also only 8 for 19 inside the arc and tonight he was often guarded by a smaller player.

- Our thin bench has become so skinny you can barely see it. Frank Anselem is no longer a part of the bench. Bourama Sidibe got in for four minutes and committed three fouls. (I don’t think they amounted to much: it seemed like the refs were waiting for him.) Symir Torrence only got in for 7 minutes because Joe was playing well but Joe might have played even better if Sy had gotten more of a shot. With the forwards not scoring, why not put Buddy at the 3 and Joe at the 2? And Benny Williams has now missed his last 11 shots. His last make was in the first Wake Forest game over a month ago. If he was going to make it big someday, shouldn’t we have seen signs of it by now?

- I hate losing to a guy named Justin Mutts. (Where’s Jeff?) But he killed us with his schools second ever triple-double and first in 14 years: 12p 14r, 11a.
 
Last edited:
- I hate losing to a guy named Justin Mutts. (Where’s Jeff?) But he killed us with his schools second ever triple-double and first in 14 years: 12p 14r, 11a.

Who let the dogs out?
Who, who, who, Who?
 
I like what your spell check did to our turnovers.

Wow! Only 1 made free throw? When I read that, my first thought was that can’t be right. Went and looked at the box score and…… I should have known better than to doubt SWC75’s recap of what happened in the game no matter how strange it seemed.
 
I like what your spell check did to our turnovers.

Wow! Only 1 made free throw? When I read that, my first thought was that can’t be right. Went and looked at the box score and…… I should have known better than to doubt SWC75’s recap of what happened in the game no matter how strange it seemed.


They are takeovers when you wind up with the ball, turnovers when you lose it.
 
- It was a valiant effort, as JB said, but your record isn’t “wins losses and valiant efforts”. It’s supposed to be a valiant effort – to win. But it’s a loss. We need to go 4-2 now to clinch a winning season during the regular season. 3-3 gets us to 16-15 but we could go 0-1 in the ACC tournament.

- I didn’t really expect to win this one but we didn’t lose it for the reasons I thought we’d lose it. I thought tech might go off from three on us, as they did against Florida State, (18 of 23), but, after an early barrage, they really didn’t. We out-shot them from three, 10/27 vs. 8/27. And I thought they’d foul out our centers and we’d wind up with Jimmy in the middle but Frank and Bourama played all 40 minutes and Frank played a heck of a game. We lost because:

- Our Forwards, Cole Swider and Jimmy Williams, scored 10 points in the first 7:36 and just four points after that, all from Cole. They were a combined 6 for 22 from the field and Cole was 0 for 5 from the arc. I think the absence of Jesse Edwards’ offensive threat allowed Tech to push up on the forwards and take them out of the game.

- We had 2 points off takeovers. Tech had 17. In ACC games we have 156 points from 153 takeovers. Our opponents have 214 from 155. I think that speaks to team speed. They can get downcourt and we can’t to cover them.

- Fouls: 18-9, free throws: 4-21. I can’t remember a game before this in which we score 1 point from the foul line.

- We were up 26-24 with 4:31 left in the first half and then suffered an 0-11 run that began with 3 straight turnovers. We wound up with four turnovers and were 0 for 4 from the field in that run. With 6:18 left in the game, we struggled back to 54-54 and then gave up another 0-11 run. That one began with a turnover but that was the only one in that stretch. The problem was we were 0 for 8 from the field and 0 for 2 from the foul line. The fact that both runs occurred late in halves make you wonder is fatigue was a factor. A lot of those missed shots were short. That ball gets heavy when you are tired.

- Buddy Boeheim was our leading scorer with 21 points but he’s 14 for 38 in his last two games. He’s 6 for 19 from three but he’s also only 8 for 19 inside the arc and tonight he was often guarded by a smaller player.

- Our thin bench has become so skinny you can barely see it. Frank Anselem is no longer a part of the bench. Bourama Sidibe got in for four minutes and committed three fouls. (I don’t think they amounted to much: it seemed like the refs were waiting for him.) Symir Torrence only got in for 7 minutes because Joe was playing well but Joe might have played even better if Sy had gotten more of a shot. With the forwards not scoring, why not put Buddy at the 3 and Joe at the 2? And Benny Williams has now missed his last 11 shots. His last make was in the first Wake Forest game over a month ago. If he was going to make it big someday, shouldn’t we have seen signs of it by now?

- I hate losing to a guy named Justin Mutts. (Where’s Jeff?) But he killed us with his schools second ever triple-double and first in 14 years: 12p 14r, 11a.
Great recap as always, SWC. Sort of sense some frustration from you. I like it.
 
Who is this Jimmy Williams now playing forward for the Cuse? Did he finally get disowned for his defense?
 
Who is this Jimmy Williams now playing forward for the Cuse? Did he finally get disowned for his defense?

Throw back night. He’s aged quite well.

 
Who is this Jimmy Williams now playing forward for the Cuse? Did he finally get disowned for his defense?

Throw back night. He’s aged quite well.


It's been a long season...

And don't call him "Bug"!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,176
Messages
4,875,398
Members
5,989
Latest member
OttosShoes

Online statistics

Members online
248
Guests online
1,522
Total visitors
1,770


...
Top Bottom