SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,717
- Like
- 64,918
This is my annual look back at my pre-season basketball preview from the perspective of six months later when we know what happened – and what didn’t happen.
Then: “From 2010-2014, we had three teams that achieved a number 1 ranking and a fourth that made the Final Four. Our overall record for those five seasons was 149-32 (.823). We were ranked for 175 of those 181 games. On selection Sunday we had records of 28-4, 26-7, 31-2, 26-9 and 27-5 and when the NCAA selection show began, we were not nervous, thinking we wouldn’t be selected. We were curious, wondering who we would play, where and when.
From 2015-18, we’ve played 13 games as a ranked team, never higher than 14th. We’ve had a combined record of 83-56 (.597). On selection Sunday, we’ve been 18-13, 19-13, 18-14 and 20-13. We were nervous except for the first year, when we’d already taken ourselves out of the NCAA tournament in hopes of lightening NCAA penalties. In the other three years we were left to the NIT once and controversially selected to the NCAA tournament twice. We had two amazing NCAA runs in those years, going a combined 7-2 and making it to another Final Four. But these years have been more frustrating than joyful. All those teams had serious limitations and we were playing in a very unforgiving conference where you need to be good and playing well to win games. Syracuse fans have pinned for the days when we had ‘loaded’ teams that could compete with anybody and carried serious ambitions, not just dreams, of winning another national title: Would we ever return to that level?“
Now: Not this year. We did do enough in a year of a weak bubble to be curious on selection Sunday but we were an 8 seed and lost in the first round to finish 20-14, giving us a five year record of 103-70.
Then: “Tyus Battle, who averaged 19.2 points per game, the highest by an SU player in 14 years, after testing the waters of the NBA, decided to return to school for his junior year. That meant that our entire starting line-up from a Sweet 16 team that came very close to making the Elite 8 would be returning. The last time every starter returned for Syracuse was for the 2000 season. the same group that had limped their way to a 21-12 record and a first round loss in an 8-9 game in 1999 won their first 19 games and made it to a #4 national ranking in 2000…Our final record that year was 26-6, a 5 ½ game improvement. If we improve by 5 1/2 games over our 23-14 record of last year and advance two further games in the NCAA tournament, as we did back then, we’d be something like 28-8.”
Now: We stumbled to a 20-14 record, three games worse than last year and wound up in an 8-9 game, which lost, as we had done in 1999. Of the five returning starters, Battle improved somewhat by becoming a more efficient shooter and a better all-around player, even playing the point at times. Howard was shell of himself. Chukwu was about the same. So was Brissett, except he had trouble making free throws. Because of high expectations, he was considered a disappointment. Dolezaj had trouble adjusting to coming off the bench and having to play center for long stretches. So, as a group those five returning starters were not as good as they had been in 2018. You expect that most returning college players will improve so a group of five guys will have a net improvement but it didn’t happen.
Then: “Jim Boeheim’s biggest problem won’t be to find players who can do the things needed to win games. It will be to find ways to allow all his players to contribute to the team and not hurt their chemistry. But even that could result in team improvement. Last year our depth problem was so bad that our “Big Three” players, Tyus Battle, Frank Howard and Oshae Brissett typically played entire games against any significant opponents. These guys played the entirety of 65 games between them, including an overtime (Battle and Brissett) and a double overtime game, (Battle). Battle averaged 39.0 minutes per game, Howard 38.4 and Brissett 38.1. Those are the three top minutes per game averages in Syracuse history, (at least back to 1980, which is as far as the stats go)…But if Battle, Howard and Brissett could play 35 or maybe even 32 minutes a game, they’d play with greater efficiency and that could improve the quality of the team. The new players and the depth they can provide could allow that.
Now: We did give our starters more rest this year. Battle averaged 36.3 MPG but Brissett was at 33.0 and Howard 26.3. Elijah Hughes averaged 32.6, Dolezaj 21.7 and Chukwu 20.1. Nobody’s performance suffered from exhaustion. But it didn’t seem to help.
Then: “Chuwku developed into a very effective defensive center and a decent rebounder, (the forwards do much of the rebounding in JB’s system). Offensively, he was barely there. He had no shot, no moves and even had trouble catching passes, especially alley-oops. 5.4 points, 6.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks, (18th in the country), while playing 27 minutes a game. He was a big reason the opposition went from scoring 75 to 64 points per game, which was important because our offensive output dropped from 76 to 67 points per game. This year we hope for more of the same, with a bit better mastery of catching the ball. The development of Marek Dolezaj could increase his touches and his offensive output incrementally. “
Now: Our scoring increased to 69.7ppg and we gave up 66.1ppg, although our defense never seemed to be the weapon it has been in past years. Paschal’s numbers went down to 4.4p 5.4r and 1.7b. His ball catching skills have never developed. He sustained some kind of groin injury that made it difficult for him to jump. Fortunately, he’s still 7-2. But his aggressiveness varied and he was often in JB’s doghouse. One night I got off the shuttle bus to take the walk across campus and a scalper said “I can get you a seat right next to Boeheim! I told him “That’s Chukwu’s seat.”
Then: “We will see this year if an operation Sidibe had in the off season will free him to fully develop and display his talents. If he is again limited we will again see Marek Dolezaj playing some center, which would be unfortunate. A combination of Dolezaj and Sidibe on the floor at the same time could be very productive, with Marek using his passing skills to get the ball to Bourama in the paint.”
Now: Bourama’s season just never got off the runway. He played for only brief periods and never had anything like the 18 point 16 rebound game he had against Pittsburgh in 2018. He basically fell to third string center behind Dolezaj, who is not anyone’s idea of a center. His best game was probably in the regular season finale vs. Clemson when he had 8 points and 4 rebounds in a losing effort. He admitted after the season that his knee was still bothering him. I still think he is a much more talented, if shorter player than Chukwu but unless his health improves, we may never get to see it. JB has recruited what might be a similar player in John Bol Ajak and is trying to get another in Jesse Edwards, so he’s going to have to fight for his job next year.
Then: “As a freshman, Oshae averaged 14.9 points and 8.8 rebounds per game while leading the team in blocked shots with 29, (because he averaged 38 minutes a game to Chukwu’s 27). He had 13 double-doubles and needed a single rebound to get 7 more….He showed good form on his outside shot early on, but that’s all he got out of it in the first 15 games as he missed 43 of his first 58 three pointers, (made 25.9%). I got some mileage out of a joke, suggesting that the national anthem singers were very polite to ask Oshae if he could see because it looked like a good question. But in the last 22 games, he was 40 for 108, (37.0%). He was also our best player at driving to the basket, although he needed further development there, too, as he might have led the nation in charging fouls. He also could have been a better finisher. He was our best dunker but he only shot 36.6% on two point shots…. his consistency was amazing: he scored in double figures in 22 of those games, including every NCAA game. He had 8 or more rebounds 26 times….. If he shoots well from outside the whole season, learns to avoid charging calls and finish more consistently, he could put up better numbers in less time. He could be an All-American. The NBA already wanted him more than Battle, so his sophomore year could be his last here.”
Now: He averaged 33 minutes a game and saw his output reduced to 12.4 points and 7.5 rebounds per game. The reduction was an illusion caused by his reduced minutes: of you multiple that by 38/33 you get 14.3ppg and 8.6rpg. He had 7 double-doubles and could have had two more with an extra rebound. His shooting declined from the arc, (33% to 27%) and the line (79% to 66%) but improved within the arc 37% to 44%. His problem was not that he got worse overall: it’s that we expected more in his sophomore year than we had seen in his freshman year and we didn’t get it. He was trying too many three point shots early and people felt he was auditioning for the NBA. He recently announced he was “testing the waters” for the NBA. That usually means he’s going, Battle being the only recent exception.
Then: “Elijah is a mystery man, having transferred here from the non-basketball power East Carolina, where he averaged a non-earth shaking 7.8 ppg and 2.3 rpg. But reports from practice last year were that he was typically matched up against the similar-size Tyus Battle in practice and gave our star player all he wanted in those contests. He was supposed to be an excellent outside shooter but a fine all-around player as well…. It’s speculated that he could take a forward positon from Marek. It was also speculated that JB knew what he had in Marek and wanted to give Elijah some serious time to see what he could do. Hughes would increase our firepower but we’d lose size and some of the things Marek does well, such as shot-blocking, rebounding and passing, especially to the post. But Hughes is hardly one-dimensional himself…. I think what will happen is that there will be two rotations: one for forward and one for guard and that Hughes will be part of both of them. Battle, Howard, Hughes, Carey and Boeheim can all play the backcourt, (so can Washington, who may not be ready). Brissett, Dolezaj and Hughes can all play forward, (so can Braswell but we may not need him yet). I expect to see a lot of Elijah at both positions but also a lot of Marek at forward.
Now: Nope. JB wanted Hughes firepower in the game from the beginning so he started at forward and played there all year. Marek came off the bench and was more often at center than forward. Hughes had a very good year, essentially displacing Frank Howard as the third member of the “Big Three” while scoring 13.7 ppg and grabbing 4.7 rebounds. He also showed an ability to block shots. He was the team’s best three point shooter at 36.9%. He became a little too dependent on the trey as the season progressed. He’s an athletic player and needs to work on driving toward the basket more than he does. But with Battle gone, he will be the team’s top returning scorer and #1 offensive option next year, which means he’ll get the most attention for the defense. He’ll have to adjust to that, as Battle successfully did in his second season.
Then: Marek Dolezaj’s “skill level and court awareness were at a higher level than a typical freshman. He always seemed to be where the ball was. He was an excellent passer. He could rebound and block shots. He had a smooth-looking jump shot but rarely seemed to use it, deferring to his teammates…Marek’s offensive tentativeness hurt us during the year even as his other skills helped us and he did kind of ‘hit the wall’ when the conference schedule began. But late in the year he did seem to gain more confidence in his shot, (or the appropriateness of his taking it), and it did begin to open things up for his teammates and for his passes to his teammates. This year, we could see more scoring from Marek, fewer defenders on his teammates and more effective passing from Marek. I especially look to see Marek feeding the post more, which could make our centers more productive, particularly a healthy Sidibe, who could shine if we could consistently get the ball to him in good situations. Marek would be a major weapon against zones from the high post.”
Now: Marek still had his skills but his development seemed held back by having to come off the bench, especially since he was often out of positon at center. He showed more confidence and aggressiveness at times but disappeared at other times. He committed many more fouls and was in foul trouble often, again probably because he was out of positon at center. If Brissett leaves, he may finally get that starting positon and be able to play his natural positon at forward. We may finally get to see his game blossom. The dream of his feeding the post for scores never developed, partially because Chukwu and Sidibe never developed and partially because they were often on the bench and it was Dolezaj who was in the post. Why we don’t put him in the high post every time against a zone defense, I don’t know. As a tall guy who can pass and shoot, he’s the ideal guy for that spot. Our offense always seems to function better when he’s in the game. Maybe we should call him “Oil Can” because he lubricates us(he baseball pitcher who used that nickname is retired so it might be available.) But for now, he’s the “Slender Slovak”.
Then: “Braswell was the consolation prize for losing Darius Bazley. He was an unheralded forward recruit with considerable potential. He’s a classic Syracuse forward: long and lean, except that he has a really good outside shot. He can also, from his tapes, pass the ball well and block shots. He was the South Carolina high jump champion with 6-11. But he’s probably going to have to wait his turn to be a part of the final rotation. We’ll see him play early in the season but when we go from 10 scholarship players to what I think will be an 8 man rotation, he will be one of the odd men out, probably #10 on the roster.”
Now: That was a correct assessment. The question is: when will his turn come? Even if Brissett leaves, Dolezaj and Hughes will be ahead of him. And here comes Quincy Guerrier, an outstanding forward prospect. Robert looked excellent playing against reserves and walk-ons this year. He played a total of 55 minutes, scoring 26 points, pulling down 10 rebounds, passing for 5 assists and making 6 steals and 2 blocks. He shot 66.7% from the field, 50% from the arc and 75% from the line. Of course the level of completion when he was in the game is a big factor but he looked smooth and confident and seemed to know what he was doing out there. He looked like a future star, if he ever gets the chance to be one.
Then: “People sweated out Tyus Battle’s big decision in the spring. He made a serious run at impressing the NBA but felt, in the end, he could benefit from another year at SU, (something that rarely happens: when kids decide they want to go, they go even if their draft prospects aren’t that great). That gives us a returning All-America candidate. Last year he averaged 19.7ppg, the highest scoring average for a Syracuse player since Hakim Warrick averaged 21.4 in 2005. His average was that high in part because he had to average 39 minutes a game…This year he will be far from our only offensive option so the defense will have to play him straight up. He won’t get 39 minutes a game but won’t have to play that many either. It should result in increased efficiency, even if he doesn’t score as high as 19.7. The interesting question is: how much better can Battle get than he already is? Can he fix his jump shot to make it more effective, or at least ‘prettier’ so the NBA scouts will like it? Maybe the answer is in his all-around game. He’s 6-6 but averaged only 3.0 rebounds per game. Attempts to use him as a small forward failed because of the loss of rebounding. He was a guard but averaged only 2.1 assists per game. He was a good defender and averaged 1.5 steals and even blocked 7 shots. But a player whose value is almost entirely in his scoring who has, (by NBA standards) mediocre range and a hitch in his shot is far from an ideal prospect.
Now: Battle didn’t disappoint anybody. His scoring dropped from 19.7 ppg to 17.2, largely because he was playing 36 minutes a game instead of 39. His rebounding improved from 2.9 to 3.3 and his assists from 2.1 to 2.5, largely because he had to play the point in some sports due to Frank Howards’ injury and Jalen Carey’s slump. He became a better all-around player but then found that the NBA wasn’t interested any more: he’s not on any of the mock drafts. I think he’s another SU player who will make his living traveling the world playing the game in various exotic spots. But we’ll always remember him here as one of the better players ever to wear Orange.
Then: “Frank Howard totally turned his career at Syracuse around last season. He’d played sparingly his first two years, held back by injuries and the lack of a jump shot. He showed some creative passing ability but sometimes too creative. There were reports that he’d become something of a clubhouse lawyer and even that he’d warned recruits away from Syracuse. Many felt he wouldn’t bother coming back for his junior year. Instead he came back strong, acting and talking like a team leader and displaying a surprising jump shot with good range. His scoring went from 4.5 ppg to 14.4. He wasn’t all that aggressive in breaking down a defense so his assist to turnover ratio was mediocre at 4.7/3.4. But he became part of our “big three” of players averaging 38-39 minutes per game who were indispensable to the team… I don’t know how much better he can get. Carey may push him into being more aggressive off the dribble. He was 33% for three point range last year. That may improve some. But right now his biggest problem is his health. He injured his “lower leg” in pre-season practice and has been wearing a “boot” to try to accelerate his recovery but “there is no timetable for his return.“
Now: This, to me, was the story of the season. We now know he suffered an ankle injury, (one story said it was broken) and had to have an operation. He probably should have red-shirted but Howard Washington wasn’t ready to come back yet and Jalen Carey was injured as well. Frank sat out the first four games and played unsteadily and erratically after that. He was never really a point guard: more of a ‘2’ guard who brought the ball upcourt at a slow pace. Then Tyus Battle went out for the ACC tournament with a back injury and Howard suddenly became the player we’d hoped for, scoring 44 points in two games, including 28 against mighty Duke. Then all of a sudden he was suspended for failing a drug test and his season and career here was over. People criticized him for his disloyalty to his teammates, assuming that the drug involved was a street drug. But there was speculation that it might have been human growth hormone, which would be used to overcome an injury. The theory would be that, with Battle out, he knew the team need him to be a productive leader and he had never really gotten over his injury, so he took the stuff to perform as well as he did in the ACCT. But SU did a test before the NCAA tournament because the NCAA does post game testing there and the school could not afford to get in trouble again. They found out what Frank had done and suspended him. Is that what really happened? I don’t know. At this point, it no longer matters. But I think we could have won 4-5 more games with a healthy Frank, one of them being the Baylor game that ended the season, (although if we’d won 4-5 more games we wouldn’t even have been playing them). A “Big Four” of Frank, Tyus, Elijah and Oshae would have been tough to beat.
Then: “Carey was our highest rated recruit for this year’s freshman class, (top 40, which made the recruiting-obsessed fans happy). Observers have said they see a future NBA player in him. With the log jam at guard he probably won’t get enough playing time to be a one-and-done but he’s not likely to be a four year guy, either. He’s supposed to be a whiz at breaking down a defense and getting to the basket. He also has quick hands and could be effective at the top of the zone with the 7-2 Chukwu behind him. He’s looked at primarily as a point guard. There’s talk that Carey will bring back the legendary Syracuse running game, which has been absent in recent years. There’s talk that JB will want him to as he’s been experimenting with a press to speed things up in practice, something he hasn’t used in years.
Now: Jalen Carey showed his talent in the otherwise disappointing trip to New York, where we sustained our first two losses. In two games, Jalen scored 40 points, 10 rebounds and 6 steals. He also had 8 turnovers and only 1 assist but nobody was complaining too loudly. The rest of the season he had 47 points, 29 rebounds, 24 assists and 33 turnovers. He had a flat, inaccurate outside shot (17.4% from three point range), and he tried to drive through defenses as if he was still high school and got stripped or lost control of the ball over and over. JB lost faith in him and his playing time dropped as the season went along until he hardly played at the end of the year. He played 72 minutes in 19 ACC games and 3 minutes in the finale against Baylor. People speculated that he might be a different kind of “one and done” – a guy who transfers out after a year because he was upset over his lack of playing time, especially considering the ineffectiveness of Frank Howard and the absence of Howard Washington. There was no “inside information suggesting this, just speculation that he might be thinking of that. Others figure that he’ll stay because JB will be “tossing him the keys to the car” next year. But with Washington back and Joe Girard and Brycen Goodine being added to the team, the competition for the point guard spot will be intense and the losers may not have a shot at that spot for the remainder of their careers.
Then: “Still, people speculated that Buddy would have a hard time cracking the guard rotation, (he’s 6-5 while his brother is 6-8). Then came the exhibition game against St. Rose. Buddy scored 19 points in 28 minutes, hitting 3 of 7 three pointers and 4 of 6 two pointers. (In the second exhibition against LeMoyne he scored 13 on 5/9 and 3 for 5 treys), He made both his free throws. He did have three turnovers but also had an assist and a steal. As a freshman in his first game, he committed just 1 foul in those 28 minutes. He made a beautiful move to dribble around a defender and hit a two point jumper, which he got off very quickly. His jumper was smooth as silk and he had range out to 25 feet. He looked just too good to keep on the bench. But with Battle, Howard, Carey, Hughes and Washington, where does he fit in? Daddy will have to figure that out.”
Now: Buddy somehow lost his touch after the good performances in the exhibition games. In his first six regular season games he was 4 for 30 from the field, 3 for 20 from the arc. People were posting that he was on the team only because his Dad was the coach and he was a waste of a scholarship. But then he began to calm down and his natural ability took over. He scored 11 points vs. Northeastern on three treys. He upped that to 12 vs. St. Bonaventure, going 3 for 3 from the arc. Most freshmen “hit the wall” when the conference season starts but Buddy did the hitting. He hit double figures 9 times with a high of 20 against Pittsburgh in a game we needed to win in the ACCT. He shot 47% from the field and 40% from three. He also showed a good understanding of the defense and quick hands in the passing lanes. His handle seemed pretty solid, (just 25 turnovers in 34 games). He was not one for driving to the basket like Battle but he could use the dribble to set up his shots. He reminded me of Trevor Cooney, except I think Buddy is a better shooter. He looked like a guy who could be our shooting guard for the next three years.
Then: “From 2010-2014, we had three teams that achieved a number 1 ranking and a fourth that made the Final Four. Our overall record for those five seasons was 149-32 (.823). We were ranked for 175 of those 181 games. On selection Sunday we had records of 28-4, 26-7, 31-2, 26-9 and 27-5 and when the NCAA selection show began, we were not nervous, thinking we wouldn’t be selected. We were curious, wondering who we would play, where and when.
From 2015-18, we’ve played 13 games as a ranked team, never higher than 14th. We’ve had a combined record of 83-56 (.597). On selection Sunday, we’ve been 18-13, 19-13, 18-14 and 20-13. We were nervous except for the first year, when we’d already taken ourselves out of the NCAA tournament in hopes of lightening NCAA penalties. In the other three years we were left to the NIT once and controversially selected to the NCAA tournament twice. We had two amazing NCAA runs in those years, going a combined 7-2 and making it to another Final Four. But these years have been more frustrating than joyful. All those teams had serious limitations and we were playing in a very unforgiving conference where you need to be good and playing well to win games. Syracuse fans have pinned for the days when we had ‘loaded’ teams that could compete with anybody and carried serious ambitions, not just dreams, of winning another national title: Would we ever return to that level?“
Now: Not this year. We did do enough in a year of a weak bubble to be curious on selection Sunday but we were an 8 seed and lost in the first round to finish 20-14, giving us a five year record of 103-70.
Then: “Tyus Battle, who averaged 19.2 points per game, the highest by an SU player in 14 years, after testing the waters of the NBA, decided to return to school for his junior year. That meant that our entire starting line-up from a Sweet 16 team that came very close to making the Elite 8 would be returning. The last time every starter returned for Syracuse was for the 2000 season. the same group that had limped their way to a 21-12 record and a first round loss in an 8-9 game in 1999 won their first 19 games and made it to a #4 national ranking in 2000…Our final record that year was 26-6, a 5 ½ game improvement. If we improve by 5 1/2 games over our 23-14 record of last year and advance two further games in the NCAA tournament, as we did back then, we’d be something like 28-8.”
Now: We stumbled to a 20-14 record, three games worse than last year and wound up in an 8-9 game, which lost, as we had done in 1999. Of the five returning starters, Battle improved somewhat by becoming a more efficient shooter and a better all-around player, even playing the point at times. Howard was shell of himself. Chukwu was about the same. So was Brissett, except he had trouble making free throws. Because of high expectations, he was considered a disappointment. Dolezaj had trouble adjusting to coming off the bench and having to play center for long stretches. So, as a group those five returning starters were not as good as they had been in 2018. You expect that most returning college players will improve so a group of five guys will have a net improvement but it didn’t happen.
Then: “Jim Boeheim’s biggest problem won’t be to find players who can do the things needed to win games. It will be to find ways to allow all his players to contribute to the team and not hurt their chemistry. But even that could result in team improvement. Last year our depth problem was so bad that our “Big Three” players, Tyus Battle, Frank Howard and Oshae Brissett typically played entire games against any significant opponents. These guys played the entirety of 65 games between them, including an overtime (Battle and Brissett) and a double overtime game, (Battle). Battle averaged 39.0 minutes per game, Howard 38.4 and Brissett 38.1. Those are the three top minutes per game averages in Syracuse history, (at least back to 1980, which is as far as the stats go)…But if Battle, Howard and Brissett could play 35 or maybe even 32 minutes a game, they’d play with greater efficiency and that could improve the quality of the team. The new players and the depth they can provide could allow that.
Now: We did give our starters more rest this year. Battle averaged 36.3 MPG but Brissett was at 33.0 and Howard 26.3. Elijah Hughes averaged 32.6, Dolezaj 21.7 and Chukwu 20.1. Nobody’s performance suffered from exhaustion. But it didn’t seem to help.
Then: “Chuwku developed into a very effective defensive center and a decent rebounder, (the forwards do much of the rebounding in JB’s system). Offensively, he was barely there. He had no shot, no moves and even had trouble catching passes, especially alley-oops. 5.4 points, 6.8 rebounds and 2.5 blocks, (18th in the country), while playing 27 minutes a game. He was a big reason the opposition went from scoring 75 to 64 points per game, which was important because our offensive output dropped from 76 to 67 points per game. This year we hope for more of the same, with a bit better mastery of catching the ball. The development of Marek Dolezaj could increase his touches and his offensive output incrementally. “
Now: Our scoring increased to 69.7ppg and we gave up 66.1ppg, although our defense never seemed to be the weapon it has been in past years. Paschal’s numbers went down to 4.4p 5.4r and 1.7b. His ball catching skills have never developed. He sustained some kind of groin injury that made it difficult for him to jump. Fortunately, he’s still 7-2. But his aggressiveness varied and he was often in JB’s doghouse. One night I got off the shuttle bus to take the walk across campus and a scalper said “I can get you a seat right next to Boeheim! I told him “That’s Chukwu’s seat.”
Then: “We will see this year if an operation Sidibe had in the off season will free him to fully develop and display his talents. If he is again limited we will again see Marek Dolezaj playing some center, which would be unfortunate. A combination of Dolezaj and Sidibe on the floor at the same time could be very productive, with Marek using his passing skills to get the ball to Bourama in the paint.”
Now: Bourama’s season just never got off the runway. He played for only brief periods and never had anything like the 18 point 16 rebound game he had against Pittsburgh in 2018. He basically fell to third string center behind Dolezaj, who is not anyone’s idea of a center. His best game was probably in the regular season finale vs. Clemson when he had 8 points and 4 rebounds in a losing effort. He admitted after the season that his knee was still bothering him. I still think he is a much more talented, if shorter player than Chukwu but unless his health improves, we may never get to see it. JB has recruited what might be a similar player in John Bol Ajak and is trying to get another in Jesse Edwards, so he’s going to have to fight for his job next year.
Then: “As a freshman, Oshae averaged 14.9 points and 8.8 rebounds per game while leading the team in blocked shots with 29, (because he averaged 38 minutes a game to Chukwu’s 27). He had 13 double-doubles and needed a single rebound to get 7 more….He showed good form on his outside shot early on, but that’s all he got out of it in the first 15 games as he missed 43 of his first 58 three pointers, (made 25.9%). I got some mileage out of a joke, suggesting that the national anthem singers were very polite to ask Oshae if he could see because it looked like a good question. But in the last 22 games, he was 40 for 108, (37.0%). He was also our best player at driving to the basket, although he needed further development there, too, as he might have led the nation in charging fouls. He also could have been a better finisher. He was our best dunker but he only shot 36.6% on two point shots…. his consistency was amazing: he scored in double figures in 22 of those games, including every NCAA game. He had 8 or more rebounds 26 times….. If he shoots well from outside the whole season, learns to avoid charging calls and finish more consistently, he could put up better numbers in less time. He could be an All-American. The NBA already wanted him more than Battle, so his sophomore year could be his last here.”
Now: He averaged 33 minutes a game and saw his output reduced to 12.4 points and 7.5 rebounds per game. The reduction was an illusion caused by his reduced minutes: of you multiple that by 38/33 you get 14.3ppg and 8.6rpg. He had 7 double-doubles and could have had two more with an extra rebound. His shooting declined from the arc, (33% to 27%) and the line (79% to 66%) but improved within the arc 37% to 44%. His problem was not that he got worse overall: it’s that we expected more in his sophomore year than we had seen in his freshman year and we didn’t get it. He was trying too many three point shots early and people felt he was auditioning for the NBA. He recently announced he was “testing the waters” for the NBA. That usually means he’s going, Battle being the only recent exception.
Then: “Elijah is a mystery man, having transferred here from the non-basketball power East Carolina, where he averaged a non-earth shaking 7.8 ppg and 2.3 rpg. But reports from practice last year were that he was typically matched up against the similar-size Tyus Battle in practice and gave our star player all he wanted in those contests. He was supposed to be an excellent outside shooter but a fine all-around player as well…. It’s speculated that he could take a forward positon from Marek. It was also speculated that JB knew what he had in Marek and wanted to give Elijah some serious time to see what he could do. Hughes would increase our firepower but we’d lose size and some of the things Marek does well, such as shot-blocking, rebounding and passing, especially to the post. But Hughes is hardly one-dimensional himself…. I think what will happen is that there will be two rotations: one for forward and one for guard and that Hughes will be part of both of them. Battle, Howard, Hughes, Carey and Boeheim can all play the backcourt, (so can Washington, who may not be ready). Brissett, Dolezaj and Hughes can all play forward, (so can Braswell but we may not need him yet). I expect to see a lot of Elijah at both positions but also a lot of Marek at forward.
Now: Nope. JB wanted Hughes firepower in the game from the beginning so he started at forward and played there all year. Marek came off the bench and was more often at center than forward. Hughes had a very good year, essentially displacing Frank Howard as the third member of the “Big Three” while scoring 13.7 ppg and grabbing 4.7 rebounds. He also showed an ability to block shots. He was the team’s best three point shooter at 36.9%. He became a little too dependent on the trey as the season progressed. He’s an athletic player and needs to work on driving toward the basket more than he does. But with Battle gone, he will be the team’s top returning scorer and #1 offensive option next year, which means he’ll get the most attention for the defense. He’ll have to adjust to that, as Battle successfully did in his second season.
Then: Marek Dolezaj’s “skill level and court awareness were at a higher level than a typical freshman. He always seemed to be where the ball was. He was an excellent passer. He could rebound and block shots. He had a smooth-looking jump shot but rarely seemed to use it, deferring to his teammates…Marek’s offensive tentativeness hurt us during the year even as his other skills helped us and he did kind of ‘hit the wall’ when the conference schedule began. But late in the year he did seem to gain more confidence in his shot, (or the appropriateness of his taking it), and it did begin to open things up for his teammates and for his passes to his teammates. This year, we could see more scoring from Marek, fewer defenders on his teammates and more effective passing from Marek. I especially look to see Marek feeding the post more, which could make our centers more productive, particularly a healthy Sidibe, who could shine if we could consistently get the ball to him in good situations. Marek would be a major weapon against zones from the high post.”
Now: Marek still had his skills but his development seemed held back by having to come off the bench, especially since he was often out of positon at center. He showed more confidence and aggressiveness at times but disappeared at other times. He committed many more fouls and was in foul trouble often, again probably because he was out of positon at center. If Brissett leaves, he may finally get that starting positon and be able to play his natural positon at forward. We may finally get to see his game blossom. The dream of his feeding the post for scores never developed, partially because Chukwu and Sidibe never developed and partially because they were often on the bench and it was Dolezaj who was in the post. Why we don’t put him in the high post every time against a zone defense, I don’t know. As a tall guy who can pass and shoot, he’s the ideal guy for that spot. Our offense always seems to function better when he’s in the game. Maybe we should call him “Oil Can” because he lubricates us(he baseball pitcher who used that nickname is retired so it might be available.) But for now, he’s the “Slender Slovak”.
Then: “Braswell was the consolation prize for losing Darius Bazley. He was an unheralded forward recruit with considerable potential. He’s a classic Syracuse forward: long and lean, except that he has a really good outside shot. He can also, from his tapes, pass the ball well and block shots. He was the South Carolina high jump champion with 6-11. But he’s probably going to have to wait his turn to be a part of the final rotation. We’ll see him play early in the season but when we go from 10 scholarship players to what I think will be an 8 man rotation, he will be one of the odd men out, probably #10 on the roster.”
Now: That was a correct assessment. The question is: when will his turn come? Even if Brissett leaves, Dolezaj and Hughes will be ahead of him. And here comes Quincy Guerrier, an outstanding forward prospect. Robert looked excellent playing against reserves and walk-ons this year. He played a total of 55 minutes, scoring 26 points, pulling down 10 rebounds, passing for 5 assists and making 6 steals and 2 blocks. He shot 66.7% from the field, 50% from the arc and 75% from the line. Of course the level of completion when he was in the game is a big factor but he looked smooth and confident and seemed to know what he was doing out there. He looked like a future star, if he ever gets the chance to be one.
Then: “People sweated out Tyus Battle’s big decision in the spring. He made a serious run at impressing the NBA but felt, in the end, he could benefit from another year at SU, (something that rarely happens: when kids decide they want to go, they go even if their draft prospects aren’t that great). That gives us a returning All-America candidate. Last year he averaged 19.7ppg, the highest scoring average for a Syracuse player since Hakim Warrick averaged 21.4 in 2005. His average was that high in part because he had to average 39 minutes a game…This year he will be far from our only offensive option so the defense will have to play him straight up. He won’t get 39 minutes a game but won’t have to play that many either. It should result in increased efficiency, even if he doesn’t score as high as 19.7. The interesting question is: how much better can Battle get than he already is? Can he fix his jump shot to make it more effective, or at least ‘prettier’ so the NBA scouts will like it? Maybe the answer is in his all-around game. He’s 6-6 but averaged only 3.0 rebounds per game. Attempts to use him as a small forward failed because of the loss of rebounding. He was a guard but averaged only 2.1 assists per game. He was a good defender and averaged 1.5 steals and even blocked 7 shots. But a player whose value is almost entirely in his scoring who has, (by NBA standards) mediocre range and a hitch in his shot is far from an ideal prospect.
Now: Battle didn’t disappoint anybody. His scoring dropped from 19.7 ppg to 17.2, largely because he was playing 36 minutes a game instead of 39. His rebounding improved from 2.9 to 3.3 and his assists from 2.1 to 2.5, largely because he had to play the point in some sports due to Frank Howards’ injury and Jalen Carey’s slump. He became a better all-around player but then found that the NBA wasn’t interested any more: he’s not on any of the mock drafts. I think he’s another SU player who will make his living traveling the world playing the game in various exotic spots. But we’ll always remember him here as one of the better players ever to wear Orange.
Then: “Frank Howard totally turned his career at Syracuse around last season. He’d played sparingly his first two years, held back by injuries and the lack of a jump shot. He showed some creative passing ability but sometimes too creative. There were reports that he’d become something of a clubhouse lawyer and even that he’d warned recruits away from Syracuse. Many felt he wouldn’t bother coming back for his junior year. Instead he came back strong, acting and talking like a team leader and displaying a surprising jump shot with good range. His scoring went from 4.5 ppg to 14.4. He wasn’t all that aggressive in breaking down a defense so his assist to turnover ratio was mediocre at 4.7/3.4. But he became part of our “big three” of players averaging 38-39 minutes per game who were indispensable to the team… I don’t know how much better he can get. Carey may push him into being more aggressive off the dribble. He was 33% for three point range last year. That may improve some. But right now his biggest problem is his health. He injured his “lower leg” in pre-season practice and has been wearing a “boot” to try to accelerate his recovery but “there is no timetable for his return.“
Now: This, to me, was the story of the season. We now know he suffered an ankle injury, (one story said it was broken) and had to have an operation. He probably should have red-shirted but Howard Washington wasn’t ready to come back yet and Jalen Carey was injured as well. Frank sat out the first four games and played unsteadily and erratically after that. He was never really a point guard: more of a ‘2’ guard who brought the ball upcourt at a slow pace. Then Tyus Battle went out for the ACC tournament with a back injury and Howard suddenly became the player we’d hoped for, scoring 44 points in two games, including 28 against mighty Duke. Then all of a sudden he was suspended for failing a drug test and his season and career here was over. People criticized him for his disloyalty to his teammates, assuming that the drug involved was a street drug. But there was speculation that it might have been human growth hormone, which would be used to overcome an injury. The theory would be that, with Battle out, he knew the team need him to be a productive leader and he had never really gotten over his injury, so he took the stuff to perform as well as he did in the ACCT. But SU did a test before the NCAA tournament because the NCAA does post game testing there and the school could not afford to get in trouble again. They found out what Frank had done and suspended him. Is that what really happened? I don’t know. At this point, it no longer matters. But I think we could have won 4-5 more games with a healthy Frank, one of them being the Baylor game that ended the season, (although if we’d won 4-5 more games we wouldn’t even have been playing them). A “Big Four” of Frank, Tyus, Elijah and Oshae would have been tough to beat.
Then: “Carey was our highest rated recruit for this year’s freshman class, (top 40, which made the recruiting-obsessed fans happy). Observers have said they see a future NBA player in him. With the log jam at guard he probably won’t get enough playing time to be a one-and-done but he’s not likely to be a four year guy, either. He’s supposed to be a whiz at breaking down a defense and getting to the basket. He also has quick hands and could be effective at the top of the zone with the 7-2 Chukwu behind him. He’s looked at primarily as a point guard. There’s talk that Carey will bring back the legendary Syracuse running game, which has been absent in recent years. There’s talk that JB will want him to as he’s been experimenting with a press to speed things up in practice, something he hasn’t used in years.
Now: Jalen Carey showed his talent in the otherwise disappointing trip to New York, where we sustained our first two losses. In two games, Jalen scored 40 points, 10 rebounds and 6 steals. He also had 8 turnovers and only 1 assist but nobody was complaining too loudly. The rest of the season he had 47 points, 29 rebounds, 24 assists and 33 turnovers. He had a flat, inaccurate outside shot (17.4% from three point range), and he tried to drive through defenses as if he was still high school and got stripped or lost control of the ball over and over. JB lost faith in him and his playing time dropped as the season went along until he hardly played at the end of the year. He played 72 minutes in 19 ACC games and 3 minutes in the finale against Baylor. People speculated that he might be a different kind of “one and done” – a guy who transfers out after a year because he was upset over his lack of playing time, especially considering the ineffectiveness of Frank Howard and the absence of Howard Washington. There was no “inside information suggesting this, just speculation that he might be thinking of that. Others figure that he’ll stay because JB will be “tossing him the keys to the car” next year. But with Washington back and Joe Girard and Brycen Goodine being added to the team, the competition for the point guard spot will be intense and the losers may not have a shot at that spot for the remainder of their careers.
Then: “Still, people speculated that Buddy would have a hard time cracking the guard rotation, (he’s 6-5 while his brother is 6-8). Then came the exhibition game against St. Rose. Buddy scored 19 points in 28 minutes, hitting 3 of 7 three pointers and 4 of 6 two pointers. (In the second exhibition against LeMoyne he scored 13 on 5/9 and 3 for 5 treys), He made both his free throws. He did have three turnovers but also had an assist and a steal. As a freshman in his first game, he committed just 1 foul in those 28 minutes. He made a beautiful move to dribble around a defender and hit a two point jumper, which he got off very quickly. His jumper was smooth as silk and he had range out to 25 feet. He looked just too good to keep on the bench. But with Battle, Howard, Carey, Hughes and Washington, where does he fit in? Daddy will have to figure that out.”
Now: Buddy somehow lost his touch after the good performances in the exhibition games. In his first six regular season games he was 4 for 30 from the field, 3 for 20 from the arc. People were posting that he was on the team only because his Dad was the coach and he was a waste of a scholarship. But then he began to calm down and his natural ability took over. He scored 11 points vs. Northeastern on three treys. He upped that to 12 vs. St. Bonaventure, going 3 for 3 from the arc. Most freshmen “hit the wall” when the conference season starts but Buddy did the hitting. He hit double figures 9 times with a high of 20 against Pittsburgh in a game we needed to win in the ACCT. He shot 47% from the field and 40% from three. He also showed a good understanding of the defense and quick hands in the passing lanes. His handle seemed pretty solid, (just 25 turnovers in 34 games). He was not one for driving to the basket like Battle but he could use the dribble to set up his shots. He reminded me of Trevor Cooney, except I think Buddy is a better shooter. He looked like a guy who could be our shooting guard for the next three years.