Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Pyle, post: 2060528, member: 137"] I'd go in the opposite direction. Most schools are recruiting for their system as it is, therefore their ranking are on point. However, plugging a class ranked in the 50's into a system they weren't recruited for has the effect of dropping that class a good 20 spots or so. I'd also like to add that the people saying it's crapshoot between 60 and 40 are talking coachspeak and sorry but acting as apologists. The schools recruiting around the 40's are schools like Pitt who has beaten us consistently over the past decade while we hang out in the 60's range. Are you telling me there's no difference between a 55th ranked class and a 75th one? What I've come to learn over the years is that yes, star ratings are a crapshoot...per individual player. But overall recruiting rankings aren't completely made up of smoke and mirrors. A bad class is a bad class, kinda like our 2012 one was. [/QUOTE]