To those that foolishly say that we have the talent we
- Thread starter dasher
- Start date
How about answering my question. Rate our units. Maybe, just maybe, our coaches did an unreal job last year.
Jerome Smith 2013 stats 12 games played, 184 rushing attempts, 840 yards, 4.6 ypa.
Prince Tyson-Gulley 2014 stats 10 games played, 116 rushing attempts, 568 yards, 4.9 ypa
PTG has been fine as the lead RB. I don't think Jerome Smith on this team makes us better significantly better on offense. Our QB play and offensive coaching staff has been sub-par
How many lead backs in the ACC is PTG better than? Look, our coaches have to get better. The clock management is terrible. Some of the play calling is very bad. But our talent is way overrated by our fans. We raen't good enough to be better than average at best. Throw in a lot of injuries and a play here and there and we are 3-7 heading to 3-9. A lot has to get better here. First and foremost is the talent.
KCJax03
Scout Team
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 284
- Like
- 360
No question the teams Syracuse is trotting out now could not hold a candle to the teams back in the 90's on paper. I just find it interesting that even back then there were those that explained away losses to bad teams as some sort of player deficiency as opposed to coaching. How many future NFL players did those Minnesota and Oklahoma teams have that beat a Syracuse team loaded NFL talent back in 1996/1997?
Folks still tried to argue lack of talent and / or bad match ups as reasons for these losses. In 1996, other then Syracuse, Minnesota beat only NE Lousiana, Ball State and a 2-9 Illinois team. That 1997 Oklahoma team outside of Syracuse beat only Louisville, Baylor and Texas Tech, teams that went a combined 9-24 (Texas Tech had 6 of those wins).
For some it seems like Syracuse can never have enough talent to be able to point at coaching as the reasons for failure. I am not sure a lack of identifiable future NFL talent can in and of itself be an excuse for losing to teams like Maryland or NC State. I am not sure the ACC in general outside of Florida State is really all that good right now. I am also not really disagreeing with you, this team is not that talented in comparison to the big boys of college football today, but I believe they have enough to compete on a college level with those teams who may have a future NFL guy or two somewhere on their roster, as we are all well aware as Syracuse fans that does not always translate to wins against what we would like to see as lesser competition.
Coaching has to count for something...
QB- would be bottom 2 in the ACC
RB- would be mid-pack(5-8)
WR- depends on the QB I think would be 7th-10th
OL- top 5 ACC
DE- would be bottom 3
DT- would be mid pack(5-8)
LB- would be mid pack
CB- would be mid pack
S- would be bottom 5
Coaching- would be bottom 3
This team has 6-7 win talent with a good coaching staff. Its not a conference championship level but to go 0-4 at home in conference play is a joke. This team should be 5-7 to 7-5 not 3-9.
RB- would be mid-pack(5-8)
WR- depends on the QB I think would be 7th-10th
OL- top 5 ACC
DE- would be bottom 3
DT- would be mid pack(5-8)
LB- would be mid pack
CB- would be mid pack
S- would be bottom 5
Coaching- would be bottom 3
This team has 6-7 win talent with a good coaching staff. Its not a conference championship level but to go 0-4 at home in conference play is a joke. This team should be 5-7 to 7-5 not 3-9.
Millhouse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 29,726
- Like
- 35,575
if you're going to ask everyone, you should probably give your own answer
including ND is shaky.
I would put our WR in the top 10. the defense wouldn't be as good as it is with bottom feeding d line, lb and secondary
starting o line was just fine
Wow. I couldn't disagree more. WR would be closer to last than 7 to 10. OL would be no where near top 5. CB and I like Reddish, would be much lower.
My god PTG is not chopped liver nobody is saying is Karlos Williams but the kid is definitely a mid-tier ACC starting RB. He isn't elite but he is mid-tier, when you factor in Irv Philips, Morris, etc. our RBs are not elite but they are BCS/P5 level RBs.
I was keeping mine for last but since you asked
1 qb bottom 4 rb bottom 4 o-line 7-10 They aren't bad so everyone overrates them higher d-line 11-15 lb top 6 db's 10 to 15
coaches 10 to 15 depth 11-15
West, Ishmael, Estime, Broyld, Lewis are most definitely mid-tier ACC WR core. Our QB makes them useless but this isn't last year's WRs.
What has Morris done? Irv Philips (I love) but I think he was recruited by Temple and that's about it. Did UConn even offer? PTG is okay at best. No power and really no breakaway speed.
Which one of those guys would start on any top 5 ACC team?
Millhouse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 29,726
- Like
- 35,575
moving the goal posts
Duke is a top 5 ACC team right? Outside of Crowder all of them would play significantly for Duke.
West plays and starts for any ACC team. He would be the #2 for FSU behind Greene
Ishmael would play for Duke, Georgia Tech, Louisville
Estime and Broyld would as well.
C'mon man I am not comparing our talent to Florida State or Clemson, but we have enough material for this coaches to be doing a better job. Marrone would not have this team 3-7 with the same roster now that is obvious.
OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 227,337
- Like
- 407,210
Marrone's down to his 3rd and 4th string QB, and 2nd string OL just like Shafer is, right?
If we started this season with DM as HC and played out it we would be better than 3-7 after 10 games with our current talent is what I am saying. Any player with DM could have been injured in any game any play. I have absolutely no confidence in this coaching staff.
They aren't going to get fired because Shafer is getting year 3, but this staff is our biggest weakness in context to teams like Maryland, NC State, Louisville, Boston College, Pittsburgh, Duke's talent on their rosters.
If you gave Cutcliffe on our roster on Saturday and gave Shafer Duke's roster. Cutcliffe would have made the final score different if not an Orange win. This team hasn't found the niche for the talent on the roster. Last year we embraced the power run game even though McDonald wanted up tempo and the talent hasn't changed much and we abandoned the power run game.
Don't know about that. Marrone never faced a schedule like the one we play now. And hald way through his last season, fans wanted Marrone out. Oh, and last year we beat Maryland, N.C State and Boston College. We had a 1 pt loss to Pitt. Not too bad. We didn't play the Ville
The last coaching staff. You can't possibly blame this staff with only frosh to count on for them. And the frosh have been quite good. The only bright light besides our walk on kicker.
Crusty
Living Legend
- Joined
- May 21, 2012
- Messages
- 13,572
- Like
- 19,164
How are you going to rank anything except by results? Anything else is just BS. This whole thread is BS.
phil77
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 9,383
- Like
- 20,389
Shafer has been here for a long time this isn't his first season or even second season recruiting for Syracuse. You state people like Long, Ish, Estime, Philips wouldn't play for other teams. The whole point of keeping Shafer was to keep the Marrone momentum going.
Not at all. Simply saying, these guys aren't that good.
Sorry you don't approve. Start your own thread. I state we don't have talent. You cry B.S. That's B.S. Rank our units my frind or shut up.
And he did. Last year was better than any year Marrone had. 7-6 record against better comp. This year, injury riddled. Does the coaching need to get better, yes. Do we need better players more, yes.
