Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 1014387, member: 652"] I wouldn't include Buffalo in that grouping because Buffalo doesn't care about SUFB like it does SUBB. I think including Rochester/Syraucse/Utica/Watertown/Elmira/Albany is fair game. Also, the point of this isn't that SU isn't in a top 50 market. We carry our weight for our conference thru good hoops, academics, and upticking football. I just think the ACC has the potential to grow because of the markets it currently has teams in and could get better with more successful seasons. [/QUOTE]