Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
UCLA a 4 seed...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 2093805, member: 1969"] [B]All I am trying to do is find a way to equate the records of Gonzaga and the 3 top PAC-12 teams.[/B] I am not arguing that the WCC = Pac 12 top to middle. It doesn't and I never stated that. 1. We are comparing Arizona-Oregon-UCLA vs Gonzaga. Of course the P12 is better at the top. They have 3 great teams vs 1 great team. I agree they are better at the top. [B]That is the very reason I am discounting 2 losses from those teams at the top of the Pac-12. [/B] 2. What I am trying to determine is if I should discount the Pac-12 records by even more than 2 games. So I need to compare the other decent teams in both conferences. 6 games in the WCC vs 7 or 8 in the Pac-12 Cal, USC, Utah, Stanford. Colorado vs St. Mary's, BYU, San Francisco I am comparing them based on this year. Not prior year. Not their historical prestige, their fanbase, their arenas, the players they currently have in the NBA. And I don't care if BYU has 25 year olds on their team. Before you say the Pac12 group is clearly better. Consider the following - St. Mary's is clearly the best of the group based on any analytical system. - Analytics say that San Francisco is about the same level as Stanford - The above group of WCC teams is 3-1 against those Pac 12 teams this year. St. Mary's wins by 15 at Stanford BYU win over Colorado San Francisco win over Utah on a neutral court USC wins over BYU on a neutral court I don't understand how one could then argue the Pac12 group above is that much harder. I am not arguing that the group of WCC is better. But are they certainly no worse. I view it as a wash. So I am not going to discount the records of Arizona, Oregon or UCLA anymore. 3. I don't care if Washington, Washington St, Oregon St, and Arizona St, have been good teams in the past. Any top 3 seed will sweep the above teams and will sweep the bottom teams in the WCC. They are all irrelevant games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
UCLA a 4 seed...
Top
Bottom