Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="wgdsr, post: 4543183, member: 7179"]
thanks.  really, no one has any idea.
some things:
- adler himself makes up for alot, and a solid goalie.  both they and p'ton i suspect have capable replacements on the roster.
- g'town lost an absolute s***load?  6! all americans, including 2 1sts and a 3rd. solomon and kelly probably did the absolute minimum in production to stay on the field, and evidently not even that.  plus, there's the hoyas nc$$ foibles to date.
- i've never heard any comment from selectors on nd's not having enough games, and they've done it forever. and their ooc schedule looks very good, although missing an ivy. their problem will be having a non-taylor offense until at least march if at all, and that version was bad last year. 
- harvard lost madronic and a 50% goalie and 40% fo guy.  the latter 2 seem like no problem, did they lose anyone else?  if not, they seem prime to keep rising even tho it is harvard and the ivy's probably never been tougher to get wins.
- army's defense i suspect will be very good if they can win fo's.
- will rutgers win any top games?  they've gotten away without them and a bid the last 2 years, but i'm skeptical about a hat trick without them.
- boston might need to either win one of their ivy games or win the pl tourney again.  and with 4 or 5 candidates and a one-off tourney, not great odds.
- st joe's i agree has a lot back, including importantly att and fogo. might be enough even in a new conference.
- delaware could be very good.  good offense and a ton back, good defense and grant's an animal.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?