We need to hire a math coach... | Page 3 | Syracusefan.com
.

We need to hire a math coach...

Yeah. If there was still 41 seconds on the game clock when they started the 40 second 4th down play clock, then the clock operator would be under investigation today.

On the hindsight bright side, since it worked, I'm sure that was a nice confidence boost for the offense, and it probably needed it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I agree about it being a nice boost for the O, but as a Syracuse fan that had disaster written all over it, some sort of mishap or fumble there would have been classic SU.
 
Yup. A head scratcher. (Same with refusing a penalty to get second and 3 as opposed to first and five. Although the latter wasn't a potential game changer. ) Someone has to ask HCDM why he didn't ask Nassib to take a knee? Maybe calculus is invoved? The TV crew never brought it up either.

For those who say stop complaining, if AAM or anyone coughed up the ball and a Pitt miracle happened,... there would have been a China Sydrome on this board. And there would not be any HCDM defenders.
 
It's not about complaining. I'm ecstatic as is everyone else on this board. However, there are times to take chances (like 4th down from their 32 versus USC - BTW nice to see that he learned from that one last night!) and times to take the 100% guarantee of victory by lining up in VICTORY formation. Running either of the last two plays made little to no sense, especially the last play.

My question is once Pitt used their final timeout, why didn't they just allow SU to score? It was their only opportunity for victory (not a great one but still ... there would've been a minute plus on the clock for a drive and possible two-point conversion to tie). Of course, I'd like to think that our RB would've chosen not to score and gone down before scoring the touchdown ... who knows.

Let's get two in a row!!!

I think this is a great point. You hardly ever see it tried, but it is unquestionably the right move.

Remember, though, most of these coaches went to college for football, not game theory.
 
Was really happy to see Marrone have enough confidence in his boys to say go win this game with a 1st down. Has a psychological effect on the team.
 
I think this is a great point. You hardly ever see it tried, but it is unquestionably the right move.

Remember, though, most of these coaches went to college for football, not game theory.
Thought the same. Did any coach warn SU players???
 
Ok, so if SU doesn't get the 1st down, they would still have to punt with a second remaining, right? Then Pitt has a chance to return the punt for a TD.

No. We wouldn't have to take another snap. No punt.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I can see both sides of the argument here...you are also assuming that the long snap is executed perfectly, the punter doesn't drop the ball, and Pitt doesn't block it.
Lol, CIL are you still hammered?
 
I think a much better example was Marrone declining the offsides penalty on the first play of the game. Declining it made it 2nd and 7. Apparently he thinks the team averages less than 2 yards per play.
Wait, really?

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I think a much better example was Marrone declining the offsides penalty on the first play of the game. Declining it made it 2nd and 7. Apparently he thinks the team averages less than 2 yards per play.

You sure it was 2nd and 7? I thought the play went for 6 or 7 yards.
 
SMITH, Jerome rush for 7 yards to the SYR37 (HOLLEY,Jarred), PENALTY PITT offside defense declined.
 
I have supported Marrone but I think its time to start looking. We beat Pitt by scoring a defensive TD. Nassib imho is just adequate not a winner. Not drinking the victory cool aid on this win.

I wonder how Frank Solich would look on the SU sideline

Dave Doeren ?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,178
Messages
5,139,565
Members
6,110
Latest member
chhill

Online statistics

Members online
239
Guests online
1,763
Total visitors
2,002


...
Top Bottom