orangefog
Certified Message Board Genius; Candor King
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,154
- Like
- 73,212
Using an organic material in the turf sounds like a bad ideaThey just said Colorado's new turf has wood in it and i'm just imagining splinters.
Using an organic material in the turf sounds like a bad ideaThey just said Colorado's new turf has wood in it and i'm just imagining splinters.
Yeah, that's understandable, but he looks VERY average. Maybe it kicks in, maybe it doesn't. But, GTech just took the lead looking like crap. Let's see what Salter does now. Maybe they were being conservative with a lead. Now they trail. We should see if he is a leader or not now.
I get all that, but that doesn't mean Salter is any good. I am looking at decision making, first and foremost. not impressed so far. That can change.Did you watch the first half of ISU vs KSU? Both those QBs are considered to be quite good and it was an ugly first half for both of them. Give him at least a full game.
Rushing Salter the first two plays tells me that they don't trust his passing. It's going to get him inured.Did you watch the first half of ISU vs KSU? Both those QBs are considered to be quite good and it was an ugly first half for both of them. Give him at least a full game.
It doesn’t mean he is bad either that’s my point.I get all that, but that doesn't mean Salter is any good. I am looking at decision making, first and foremost. not impressed so far. That can change.
I can't argue that. But, he hasn't looked good yet either. His team has been gifted 3 TOs and they are tied. I know it may take time, but a review based on both teams so far, Salter doesn't look that good. They definitely can figure it out. But, I give the edge to GTech to be tied with 3 TOsIt doesn’t mean he is bad either that’s my point.
They was my point regarding ISU vs KSU … both good QBs and started poorly and if you based your opinion of them based on first half performance they weren’t stellar in the second half they were much better. I’m not a fan of his throwing motion though.I can't argue that. But, he hasn't looked good yet either. His team has been gifted 3 TOs and they are tied. I know it may take time, but a review based on both teams so far, Salter doesn't look that good. They definitely can figure it out. But, I give the edge to GTech to be tied with 3 TOs
It's all good, I am just judging the performance thus far. I am not too proud to adjust moving forward. I do think GTech pulls away. They couldn't have played worse. They handed CO the first TD. And good field position afterward with 2 TOs, but CO didn't do anything with it. Assuming GTech has settled down, I expect GTech to keep moving the ball supplementing QB runs (hoping King doesn't get injured), GTech is hard to control with what I have observed to be a weak defense for CO. That puts Salter in a position to have to pass, and so far he has proven to be a better runner than passer. If GTech can get up 2 scores, it will be that much harder for Salter to run the offense.They was my point regarding ISU vs KSU … both good QBs and started poorly and if you based your opinion of them based on first half performance they weren’t stellar in the second half they were much better. I’m not a fan of his throwing motion though.
Didn’t some expert say West Point was the best FBS I NY State
Yes they are !!They're in the Top 3
I don't think he's completed a pass further than 5 yards past the line.lol, salter is ASS. Dodged a bullet there
And then he rips off a 45 yard TD! BallerHaynes King looks dead out there after every play. No way he gets through this year healthy. What a warrior though