Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Wendell Carter's mom is cuckoo for cocoa puffs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="reedny, post: 2593433, member: 1423"] Well expressed points, as usual, and good damage control. But this (red) is where you're incorrect IMO. It's not a market. D-1 student athletes are, by definition, amateurs - including the 1-2% with pro potential. It's such a small number that, even if I bought your "compensation" argument, the exception would be driving the rule. The fact is that, as unfair as NCAA enforcement is, college sports benefit (handsomely I might add) the vast majority of SA's. Even NBA prospects (most) are just that - prospects. There is no "market" for them because, not only are they amateurs, they're not finished products. The very reason they choose college is to develop and enjoy being in an academic environment (at least at most legit schools). That is their choice, and as we saw with the Bazely fiasco, almost all of them think it's worth it. Your analysis also ignores the huge costs colleges bear in funding their BB programs (among many other institutional expenses). Syracuse spends between $13 and $14M every year on its basketball program. There's lots of TV money, BUT they pay their players stipends and all their living expenses, along with providing an environment conducive to learning. They also, by law, have to fund other Title IX programs like womens soccer, ice hockey, lacrosse and other sports that are net revenue losses. Even without the title IX issue, the "value" argument is a mirage. While SU BB usually has at least one prospect with NBA potential, most of its players are not pro prospects. Even the ones that are, jump as soon as they're ready for pro ball (and sometimes even before). You can claim all you want that these guys should be compensated as "employees", and that they have all this "value" in the "market" ... but the NBA doesn't agree. Not until they're ready to be drafted are they truly "marketable" - and then they almost always leave college. Look at Bazely, a kid with obvious pro potential. Is he being showered with endorsement money? Hardly. The only people who want to hand him cash are agents looking to score a fee off him in a couple years .. and all they do is offer loans. So your argument continues to fall apart even for the few for whom you think the whole system should be reformed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Wendell Carter's mom is cuckoo for cocoa puffs
Top
Bottom